Schaffner K F
George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2000 Jan;21(1):85-101. doi: 10.1023/a:1009901115043.
This paper attempts to address the general question whether information technologies, as applied in the area of medicine and health care, have or are likely to change fundamental concepts regarding disease and health. After a short excursion into the domain of medical informatics I provide a brief overview of some of the current theories of what a disease is from a more philosophical perspective, i.e. the "value free" and "value laden" view of disease. Next, I consider at some length, whether health care informatics is currently modifying fundamental concepts of disease. To this question I will answer largely in the negative, and I will provide the sketch of some arguments from current research programs in medical informatics why I think this is the case. This argumentation is supported by a detailed account of how the disease profile for beriberi heart disease, used in one of the major medical informatics diagnostic programs, QMR (and its ancestor INTERNIST-1), was developed, and why at least this program essentially follows received views of traditional medicine. The one main exception to the conformity of this program to "received" views of a disease occurs when the program's designers need to fine-tune a disease definition. This fine-tuning is to comport with the expert's perspective on the disease, including his or her epistemic values, as well as the program's other resources for diagnosing components of a disease.
本文试图探讨一个一般性问题,即应用于医学和医疗保健领域的信息技术是否已经或可能改变有关疾病和健康的基本概念。在简要涉足医学信息学领域之后,我将从更具哲学性的角度,简要概述一些当前关于疾病本质的理论,即疾病的“价值中立”和“价值负载”观点。接下来,我将详细探讨医疗保健信息学目前是否正在改变疾病的基本概念。对于这个问题,我的回答大体是否定的,并且我将阐述医学信息学当前研究项目中的一些论据,说明我为何这样认为。通过详细描述在主要医学信息学诊断程序之一QMR(及其前身INTERNIST - 1)中使用的脚气性心脏病的疾病概况是如何形成的,以及为何至少这个程序基本上遵循传统医学的既有观点,来支持这一论证。当该程序的设计者需要微调疾病定义时,会出现这个程序与疾病“既有”观点不一致的一个主要例外情况。这种微调是为了符合专家对疾病的看法,包括其认知价值,以及该程序用于诊断疾病组成部分的其他资源。