• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内科医生1号,一款基于计算机的通用内科实验性诊断咨询程序。

Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine.

作者信息

Miller R A, Pople H E, Myers J D

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 19;307(8):468-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198208193070803.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM198208193070803
PMID:7048091
Abstract

Internist-I is an experimental computer program capable of making multiple and complete diagnoses in internal medicine. It differs from most other programs for computer-assisted diagnosis in the generality of its approach and the size and diversity of its knowledge base. To document the strengths and weaknesses of the program we performed a systematic evaluation of the capabilities of INTERNIST-I. Its performance on a series of 19 clinicopathological exercises (Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital) published in the Journal appeared qualitatively similar to that of the hospital clinicians but inferior to that of the case discussants. The evaluation demonstrated that the present form of the program is not sufficiently reliable for clinical applications. Specific deficiencies that must be overcome include the program's inability to reason anatomically or temporally, its inability to construct differential diagnoses spanning multiple areas, its occasional attribution of findings to improper causes, and its inability to explain its "thinking".

摘要

内科医生一号(Internist-I)是一个实验性的计算机程序,能够在内科领域做出多种完整的诊断。它在方法的通用性以及知识库的规模和多样性方面,与大多数其他计算机辅助诊断程序有所不同。为了记录该程序的优缺点,我们对内科医生一号的能力进行了系统评估。它在发表于《新英格兰医学杂志》上的一系列19个临床病理病例(麻省总医院病例记录)中的表现,在质量上与医院临床医生的表现相似,但不如病例讨论者。评估表明,该程序目前的形式在临床应用中不够可靠。必须克服的具体缺陷包括该程序无法进行解剖学或时间上的推理,无法构建跨越多个领域的鉴别诊断,偶尔将检查结果归因于不恰当的原因,以及无法解释其“思维”过程。 (注:原文中“Journal”结合上下文推测为《新英格兰医学杂志》,因为提到了麻省总医院病例记录常发表于此杂志)

相似文献

1
Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine.内科医生1号,一款基于计算机的通用内科实验性诊断咨询程序。
N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 19;307(8):468-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198208193070803.
2
Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems.四种基于计算机的诊断系统的性能。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1792-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406233302506.
3
The INTERNIST-1/QUICK MEDICAL REFERENCE project--status report.内科医生1号/快速医学参考项目——进展报告
West J Med. 1986 Dec;145(6):816-22.
4
[Use of expert systems in internal medicine. Analysis of performance and reliability of the Quick Medical Reference].[内科中专家系统的应用。快速医学参考的性能与可靠性分析]
Recenti Prog Med. 1995 Dec;86(12):492-5.
5
Computer-assisted adult medical diagnosis: subject review and evaluation of a new microcomputer-based system.计算机辅助成人医学诊断:基于新型微型计算机系统的主题综述与评估
Medicine (Baltimore). 1990 May;69(3):125-36.
6
Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram.临床医生、西奈山项目和退伍军人管理局项目根据独立于心电图得出的临床病理数据进行评估。
Eur J Cardiol. 1978 Nov;8(4-5):395-412.
7
INTERNIST: computer program expressing clinical experience and judgment of a master internist constitutes a unique resource.内科医生:表达资深内科医生临床经验和判断的计算机程序构成了一种独特的资源。
Forum Med. 1978 Apr;1(1):44-7.
8
Effectiveness of the Quick Medical Reference as a diagnostic tool.快速医学参考作为一种诊断工具的有效性。
CMAJ. 1999 Sep 21;161(6):725-8.
9
[Evaluation of clinical-pathological conferences using a program for computer-assisted diagnosis; analysis of 100 case reports].[使用计算机辅助诊断程序对临床病理讨论会进行评估;对100例病例报告的分析]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990 Aug 11;134(32):1552-6.
10
Evaluation of quick medical reference (QMR) as a teaching tool.快速医学参考(QMR)作为一种教学工具的评估。
MD Comput. 1998 Sep-Oct;15(5):323-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics: A Review.人工智能和机器学习在保守牙科与牙髓病学中的作用:综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 22;17(7):e88515. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88515. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Intensive Care Medicine: Critical Recalibrations from Rule-Based Systems to Frontier Models.重症监护医学中的机器学习与人工智能:从基于规则的系统到前沿模型的关键重新校准
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 6;14(12):4026. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124026.
3
Large Language Models Could Revolutionize Health Care, but Technical Hurdles May Limit Their Applications.
大型语言模型可能会彻底改变医疗保健,但技术障碍可能会限制它们的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 25;27:e71618. doi: 10.2196/71618.
4
Dedicated AI Expert System vs Generative AI With Large Language Model for Clinical Diagnoses.用于临床诊断的专用人工智能专家系统与具有大语言模型的生成式人工智能对比
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2512994. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12994.
5
Prediction of Clavien Dindo Classification ≥ Grade III Complications After Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery Using Machine Learning Methods.使用机器学习方法预测上皮性卵巢癌手术后Clavien Dindo分级≥Ⅲ级并发症
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 10;61(4):695. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040695.
6
Artificial intelligence in surgical medicine: a brief review.外科学中的人工智能:简要综述。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 28;87(4):2180-2186. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003115. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
Development and Prospective Implementation of a Large Language Model based System for Early Sepsis Prediction.基于大语言模型的早期脓毒症预测系统的开发与前瞻性实施
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 11:2025.03.07.25323589. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.07.25323589.
8
Traumatic Brain Injury and Artificial Intelligence: Shaping the Future of Neurorehabilitation-A Review.创伤性脑损伤与人工智能:塑造神经康复的未来——综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 7;15(3):424. doi: 10.3390/life15030424.
9
GPT-4 assistance for improvement of physician performance on patient care tasks: a randomized controlled trial.GPT-4辅助改善医生在患者护理任务中的表现:一项随机对照试验。
Nat Med. 2025 Apr;31(4):1233-1238. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03456-y. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Artificial intelligence in pediatric allergy research.人工智能在儿科过敏研究中的应用
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 21;184(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05925-5.