Drescher S, Bosch R F, Mewis C, Kühlkamp V
Abteilung Klinische Pharmakologie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik, Tübingen.
Z Kardiol. 2000 Jun;89(6):522-6. doi: 10.1007/s003920070224.
The antiarrhythmic properties of adenosine, its ultra-short half-life and the absence of frequent serious side effects make it a front-line agent in arrhythmia management, especially in the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Due to a shortening of atrial refractoriness, adenosine can facilitate the induction of atrial fibrillation. Life threatening tachycardias may result from a potential rapid conduction of atrial fibrillation over an accessory pathway especially if the latter one has a short antegrade refractory period. We report a case of a 59 year old female patient in which intravenous administration of adenosine during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was followed by atrial fibrillation with rapid conduction over a hitherto unknown accessory pathway. After intravenous administration of adenosine the tachycardia was terminated successfully within 38 s. After a short period of asystole, spontaneous atrial fibrillation developed unmasking an antegrade preexcitation with subsequent rapid ventricular response (210 b/min). The three-lead ECG showed a narrow QRS complex tachycardia. Because of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm and the absence of hemodynamic compromise there was no need for external cardioversion. During electrophysiological study an antidromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia was recorded over a left posteroseptal accessory pathway including antegrade conduction properties only. Because of its ultrashort half-life, serious side effects after adenosine administration are rare. The possibility of life threatening proarrhythmias after intravenous adenosine administration should be taken into consideration if the etiology of a paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia is not clear and a concomitant Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome cannot be excluded. As with application of all intravenous antiarrhythmic agents, the administration of adenosine should only be performed if continuous ECG monitoring and cardioversion facilities are available and possible.
腺苷的抗心律失常特性、极短的半衰期以及罕见严重副作用使其成为心律失常治疗中的一线药物,尤其适用于房室结折返性心动过速的治疗。由于心房不应期缩短,腺苷可促使房颤的诱发。危及生命的心动过速可能源于房颤经旁路潜在的快速传导,特别是当旁路的前向不应期较短时。我们报告一例59岁女性患者,在典型房室结折返性心动过速发作时静脉注射腺苷后,出现房颤并经一条此前未知的旁路快速传导。静脉注射腺苷后,心动过速在38秒内成功终止。经过短暂的心脏停搏后,自发出现房颤,揭示了前向预激,随后心室反应快速(210次/分钟)。三导联心电图显示窄QRS波群心动过速。由于自发转为窦性心律且无血流动力学障碍,无需进行体外心脏复律。在电生理研究中,记录到经左后间隔旁路的逆向房室折返性心动过速,仅包括前向传导特性。由于腺苷半衰期极短,给药后严重副作用罕见。如果阵发性室上性心动过速的病因不明且不能排除合并 Wolff-Parkinson-White 综合征,应考虑静脉注射腺苷后出现危及生命的促心律失常的可能性。与所有静脉注射抗心律失常药物的应用一样,仅在有持续心电图监测和心脏复律设备且可行的情况下才能使用腺苷。