McKay L I, Cidlowski J A
Molecular Endocrinology Group, Laboratory of Signal Transduction, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2233, USA.
Mol Endocrinol. 2000 Aug;14(8):1222-34. doi: 10.1210/mend.14.8.0506.
Nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) and the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) are transcription factors with opposing actions in the modulation of immune/inflammatory responses. NF-kappaB induces the expression of proinflammatory genes, while GR suppresses immune function in part by suppressing expression of the same genes. Previously, we demonstrated that physiological antagonism between NF-kappaB and GR is due to a mutual transcriptional antagonism that requires the p65 subunit of NF-kappaB and multiple domains of GR (1). To elucidate the mechanism(s) of NF-kappaB p65 and GR transcriptional antagonism, we analyzed the interactions of wild-type p65 and p65 RHD (rel homology domain, a dominant negative mutant of p65 which lacks a transactivation domain) with GR. We show that p65RHD blocks p65-mediated transactivation, yet does not block the repression of GR transactivation by p65, indicating that transcriptional activity by p65 is not required to repress GR function. Both p65 and p65 RHD physically interact with GR, but only intact p65 represses GR-mediated signaling, implicating the p65 transactivation domain in the transcriptional repression of GR. To further characterize p65-GR interactions, we examined the role of the transcriptional co-integrator CREB binding protein (CBP) in their mutual antagonism. GR-mediated repression of p65 transactivation and p65-mediated repression of GR transactivation, as well as the physical interaction between NF-kappaB and GR, are enhanced by CBP. GR bound to the antagonist RU 486, although transcriptionally inactive, retains the ability to repress p65 transactivation. However, CBP does not physically interact with antagonist-bound GR and does not enhance its repressive effect on p65. These data suggest that CBP functions as an integrator of p65/GR physical interaction, rather than as a limiting cofactor for which p65 and GR compete.
核因子-κB(NF-κB)和糖皮质激素受体(GR)是在免疫/炎症反应调节中具有相反作用的转录因子。NF-κB诱导促炎基因的表达,而GR部分通过抑制相同基因的表达来抑制免疫功能。此前,我们证明NF-κB和GR之间的生理拮抗作用是由于相互的转录拮抗作用,这需要NF-κB的p65亚基和GR的多个结构域(1)。为了阐明NF-κB p65和GR转录拮抗作用的机制,我们分析了野生型p65和p65 RHD(rel同源结构域,p65的显性负性突变体,缺乏反式激活结构域)与GR的相互作用。我们发现p65RHD阻断p65介导的反式激活,但不阻断p65对GR反式激活的抑制作用,这表明p65的转录活性不是抑制GR功能所必需的。p65和p65 RHD均与GR发生物理相互作用,但只有完整的p65抑制GR介导的信号传导,这表明p65反式激活结构域参与了GR的转录抑制。为了进一步表征p65-GR相互作用,我们研究了转录共整合因子CREB结合蛋白(CBP)在它们相互拮抗作用中的作用。CBP增强了GR介导的对p65反式激活的抑制作用、p65介导的对GR反式激活的抑制作用以及NF-κB与GR之间的物理相互作用。与拮抗剂RU 486结合的GR虽然转录无活性,但仍保留抑制p65反式激活的能力。然而,CBP不与与拮抗剂结合的GR发生物理相互作用,也不增强其对p65的抑制作用。这些数据表明,CBP作为p65/GR物理相互作用的整合因子发挥作用,而不是作为p65和GR竞争的限制性辅因子。