Suppr超能文献

犬希氏束旁射频导管消融:瓣膜上与瓣膜下途径的比较

Parahisian radiofrequency catheter ablation in dogs: comparison of the above-valve and below-valve approaches.

作者信息

Kato R, Matsumoto K, Goktekin O, Matsuo H, Watanabe H, Takahama M

机构信息

2nd Department of Internal Medicine, and the 2nd Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical School, Japan.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000 Jun;4(2):359-68. doi: 10.1023/a:1009814803581.

Abstract

In patients with an accessory pathway close to the His bundle, radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) requires additional care to avoid damage to the normal conduction system. To assess differences between approaches from above or below the tricuspid valve (TV), we performed RFCA in 20 dogs (from above, group A, n=10; from below, group B, n=10). RF energy with temperature control at 60 degrees 60 seconds was administered at the site where a small His potential was recorded from the ablation catheter guided by fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) (in the latter six dogs). Before and after RFCA, electrophysiological testing was performed and histological findings were compared. An ablated lesion was created in 7 of 10 (2 of 2 guided by TEE) dogs in group A and 5 of 10 (3 of 4 TEE) dogs in group B. In group A, an ablated lesion involved the atrium and ventricle in the anterior site of His bundle, but the lesion was only in the ventricle in group B. An atrioventricular block (AVB) and severe damage to the penetrating bundle was observed in one dog of group A. A large hematoma on the TV was made in 2 dogs and the complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) occurred in 3 dogs of group B. The approach from below the TV was safer than that from above the TV in parahisian RFCA, because it did not create an AVB, although it has a high incidence of CRBBB and associated technical difficulties.

摘要

对于存在靠近希氏束的旁路的患者,射频导管消融术(RFCA)需要格外小心以避免损伤正常传导系统。为评估经三尖瓣(TV)上方或下方途径的差异,我们对20只犬进行了RFCA(上方途径,A组,n = 10;下方途径,B组,n = 10)。在透视和经食管超声心动图(TEE)(后6只犬)引导下,在从消融导管记录到小希氏电位的部位给予温度控制在60度60秒的射频能量。RFCA前后进行电生理测试并比较组织学结果。A组10只犬中有7只(TEE引导的2只中的2只)形成了消融灶,B组10只犬中有5只(4只TEE引导的3只中的3只)形成了消融灶。A组中,消融灶累及希氏束前方部位的心房和心室,但B组中消融灶仅在心室。A组1只犬出现房室传导阻滞(AVB)和对穿入束的严重损伤。B组2只犬在TV上形成大血肿,3只犬发生完全性右束支传导阻滞(CRBBB)。在希氏束旁RFCA中,经TV下方的途径比经TV上方的途径更安全,因为它不会导致AVB,尽管其CRBBB发生率高且存在相关技术困难。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验