Marchlinski F E, Ren J F, Schwartzman D, Callans D J, Gottlieb C D
Electrophysiology Section, Allegheny University Hospitals-MCP and the University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000 Jun;4(2):415-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1009810718602.
The crista terminalis is an important anatomic target for ablation of atrial arrhythmias. We determined the accuracy of catheter placement guided by fluoroscopy alone when directed to 24 sites along the crista terminalis in 6 patients. The sites selected included the most medial superior, most lateral superior, mid lateral, and most inferolateral sites along the crista terminalis in each patient. These sites were selected because of their recognized importance in sinus node and/or atrial tachycardia ablation and the importance of avoiding caval structures when targeting the most superior and/or inferior right atrium. The position of the catheter tip was documented using a catheter based ultrasound transducer in the right atrium or vena cava. The operator was blinded to the intracardiac echocardiographic (ICE) results until reviewing the images after the procedure in each patient. The catheter tip, guided by fluoroscopy alone, was identified by ICE to be within the right atrium and within 1cm of the crista terminalis at only 10 of the 24 sites (42%). Importantly, when targeting the most superior and inferior sites along the crista terminalis, the catheter tip, guided by fluoroscopy, was noted to be adjacent to the venous junction with the right atrium but actually located in the superior or inferior vena cava at 5 of the 18 such sites. The catheter was positioned appropriately (within 1 cm of the crista and within the right atrium) guided by fluoroscopy alone when targeting 1 of the 12 sites in the first 3 patients versus 9 of 12 sites in the last 3 patients, p<0.05. In conclusion, it appears that using fluoroscopic guidance alone: 1) localization of the crista terminalis is frequently inaccurate and 2) catheter positioning in the superior/inferior vena cava is commonly noted when targeting very superior and inferior sites along the crista terminalis. A learning curve, assisted by review of ICE recordings after each procedure, appears to improve the accuracy of catheter placement by fluoroscopy alone but still does not result in uniform success. ICE appears to facilitate and ensure accurate targeting of specific anatomic sites along the crista terminalis and thus may serve as an important adjunctive imaging technique in electrophysiology.
界嵴是房性心律失常消融的重要解剖靶点。我们确定了在6例患者中,仅在荧光透视引导下将导管放置到界嵴沿线24个位点时的准确性。所选位点包括每位患者界嵴最内侧上方、最外侧上方、中外侧以及最下外侧的位点。选择这些位点是因为它们在窦房结和/或房性心动过速消融中公认的重要性,以及在靶向右心房最上方和/或最下方时避免腔静脉结构的重要性。使用基于导管的超声换能器在右心房或腔静脉中记录导管尖端的位置。在每位患者术后查看图像之前,操作者对心内超声心动图(ICE)结果不知情。仅在荧光透视引导下,ICE发现导管尖端仅在24个位点中的10个(42%)位于右心房内且在界嵴1cm范围内。重要的是,在靶向界嵴最上方和最下方的位点时,在荧光透视引导下,导管尖端在18个此类位点中的5个被发现紧邻与右心房的静脉连接处,但实际上位于上腔静脉或下腔静脉中。在前3例患者中,仅在荧光透视引导下,12个位点中有1个位点的导管位置合适(在界嵴1cm范围内且在右心房内),而后3例患者中12个位点中有9个位点合适,p<0.05。总之,似乎仅使用荧光透视引导:1)界嵴的定位常常不准确,2)在靶向界嵴最上方和最下方的位点时,导管常被发现位于上腔静脉或下腔静脉中。通过每次术后回顾ICE记录辅助的学习曲线似乎能提高仅用荧光透视放置导管的准确性,但仍不能保证一致成功。ICE似乎有助于并确保准确靶向界嵴沿线的特定解剖位点,因此可能作为电生理中一种重要的辅助成像技术。