L'Hocine L, Wang Z, Jiang B, Xu S
School of Food Science, Wuxi University of Light Industry, 170 Huihe Road, 214036 Wuxi, People's Republic of China.
J Biotechnol. 2000 Jul 28;81(1):73-84. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(00)00277-7.
Fructosyltransferase (EC.2.4.1.9) and invertase (EC.3.2.1.26) have been purified from the crude extract of Aspergillus niger AS0023 by successive chromatographies on DEAE-sephadex A-25, sepharose 6B, sephacryl S-200, and concanavalin A-Sepharose 4B columns. On acrylamide electrophoresis the two enzymes, in native and denatured forms, gave diffused glycoprotein bands with different electrophoretic mobility. On native-PAGE and SDS-PAGE, both enzymes migrated as polydisperse aggregates yielding broad and diffused bands. This result is typical of heterogeneous glycoproteins and the two enzymes have proved their glycoprotein nature by their adsorption on concanavalin A lectin. Fructosyltransferase (FTS) on native PAGE migrated as two enzymatically active bands with different electrophoretic mobility, one around 600 kDa and the other from 193 to 425 kDa. On SDS-PAGE, these two fractions yielded one band corresponding to a molecular weight range from 81 to 168 kDa. FTS seems to undergo association-dissociation of its glycoprotein subunits to form oligomers with different degrees of polymerization. Invertase (INV) showed higher mobility corresponding to a molecular range from 82 to 251 kDa, on native PAGE, and from 71 to 111 kDa on SDS-PAGE. The two enzymes exhibited distinctly different pH and temperature profiles. The optimum pH and temperature for FTS were found to be 5.8 and 50 degrees C, respectively, while INV showed optimum activity at pH 4.4 and 55 degrees C. Metal ions and other inhibitors had different effects on the two enzyme activities. FTS was completely abolished with 1 mM Hg(2+) and Ag(2+), while INV maintained 72 and 66% of its original activity, respectively. Furthermore, the two enzymes exhibited distinctly different kinetic constants confirming their different nature. The K(m) and V(m) values for each enzyme were calculated to be 44.38 mM and 1030 micromol ml(-1)min(-1) for FTS and 35.67 mM and 398 micromol ml(-1) min(-1) for INV, respectively. FTS and INV catalytic activity was dependent on sucrose concentration. FTS activity increased with increasing sucrose concentrations, while INV activity decreased markedly with increasing sucrose concentration. Furthermore, INV exhibited only hydrolytic activity producing exclusively fructose and glucose from sucrose, while FTS catalyzed exclusively fructosyltransfer reaction producing glucose, 1-kestose, nystose and fructofuranosyl nystose. In addition, at 50% sucrose concentration FTS produced fructooligosaccharides at the yield of 62% against 54% with the crude extract.
通过在DEAE-葡聚糖A-25、琼脂糖6B、Sephacryl S-200和伴刀豆球蛋白A-琼脂糖4B柱上连续进行色谱分离,从黑曲霉AS0023的粗提物中纯化出了果糖基转移酶(EC.2.4.1.9)和转化酶(EC.3.2.1.26)。在丙烯酰胺电泳中,这两种酶的天然形式和变性形式都产生了具有不同电泳迁移率的弥散糖蛋白条带。在天然聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(native-PAGE)和十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)中,两种酶均以多分散聚集体形式迁移,产生宽而弥散的条带。这一结果是异质糖蛋白的典型特征,并且这两种酶通过它们在伴刀豆球蛋白A凝集素上的吸附证明了其糖蛋白性质。天然PAGE上的果糖基转移酶(FTS)以两条具有不同电泳迁移率的酶活性条带形式迁移,一条约600 kDa,另一条在193至425 kDa之间。在SDS-PAGE上,这两个组分产生了一条对应于分子量范围为81至168 kDa的条带。FTS似乎经历了其糖蛋白亚基的缔合-解离,以形成不同聚合度的寡聚体。转化酶(INV)在天然PAGE上显示出较高的迁移率,对应分子量范围为82至251 kDa,在SDS-PAGE上为71至111 kDa。这两种酶表现出明显不同的pH和温度曲线。发现FTS的最适pH和温度分别为5.8和50℃,而INV在pH 4.4和55℃时表现出最佳活性。金属离子和其他抑制剂对两种酶的活性有不同影响。1 mM的Hg(2+)和Ag(2+)可使FTS的活性完全丧失,而INV分别保持其原始活性的72%和66%。此外,这两种酶表现出明显不同的动力学常数,证实了它们的不同性质。每种酶的米氏常数(K(m))和最大反应速度(V(m))值经计算,FTS分别为44.38 mM和1030 μmol ml(-1)min(-1),INV分别为35. June 67 mM和398 μmol ml(-1) min(-1)。FTS和INV的催化活性取决于蔗糖浓度。FTS的活性随蔗糖浓度的增加而增加,而INV的活性则随蔗糖浓度的增加而显著降低。此外,INV仅表现出水解活性,仅从蔗糖产生果糖和葡萄糖,而FTS仅催化果糖基转移反应,产生葡萄糖、蔗果三糖、蔗果四糖和呋喃果糖基蔗果四糖。此外,在50%蔗糖浓度下,FTS产生低聚果糖的产率为62%,而粗提物的产率为54%。