Suppr超能文献

20世纪90年代急性中耳炎的管理:肺炎球菌耐药的十年。

Management of acute otitis media in the 1990s: the decade of resistant pneumococcus.

作者信息

Block S L

机构信息

Kentucky Pediatric Research, Incorporated, Bardstown 40004, USA.

出版信息

Paediatr Drugs. 1999 Jan-Mar;1(1):31-50. doi: 10.2165/00128072-199901010-00004.

Abstract

Acute otitis media (AOM) has become increasingly difficult to treat in the 1990s, the decade of drug-resistant pneumococcus. Throughout the world, drug-resistant strains of this pathogen are being recovered from 20 to 50% of cases of initial untreated AOM, and from 45 to 90% of refractory AOM. Almost as alarming is that beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae are currently being isolated in 40 to 50% of cases of AOM in the US. Clinicians can no longer expect 'Pollyanna-like' high rates of clinical resolution for this disease. It is now imperative that they become aware of the regional prevalence of these drug-resistant bacteria and, just as importantly, their patterns of antibacterial resistance. Although some authors would hold that any antibacterial, or even placebo, should be adequate for most cases of AOM, clinical practice appears to suggest otherwise. Amoxicillin, still the first-line therapeutic choice for initial nonrefractory AOM, will often fail. The real dilemma begins when clinicians search for clinical data to select an antibacterial for therapeutic failures--few data are available. Thus, to give optimal treatment to a child who has failed antibacterial therapy--the true actual indication for all second-line antibacterials--they must instead become familiar with the following in vivo and in vitro data: 1. 'In vivo sensitivity data': otherwise known as bacteriological efficacy, in which repeat tympanocentesis is performed in mid-therapy. This reveals the bacterial 'Achilles heel' or weakness for the individual antibacterial agents. 2. Clinical efficacy data: analysis of rates of clinical resolution after therapy in comparative trials which use a single tympanocentesis initially and a 'gold standard' comparator antibacterial. 3. 'Bug to drug' data: comparison of reported middle ear concentrations for each individual antibacterial agent relative to the respective minimum inhibitory concentrations of isolates, particularly drug-resistant pneumococcus and H. influenzae (if possible, obtained from the paediatric respiratory tract). The selection of an antibacterial agent for AOM in any particular case should not be merely a random process. It involves awareness of the pathogens most likely to be observed: with co-infections; after failure with a particular antibacterial (the bacterial 'Achilles heel' of the drug); and at different points in time, whether initially or after therapeutic failures (e.g. first-line versus fourth-line failure).

摘要

在20世纪90年代,即耐药肺炎球菌出现的十年里,急性中耳炎(AOM)的治疗变得越来越困难。在世界各地,这种病原体的耐药菌株在20%至50%的未经治疗的初始AOM病例中被分离出来,在45%至90%的难治性AOM病例中被分离出来。几乎同样令人担忧的是,目前在美国40%至50%的AOM病例中分离出了产β-内酰胺酶的流感嗜血杆菌菌株。临床医生不能再期望这种疾病有“盲目乐观”的高临床治愈率。现在,他们必须了解这些耐药细菌在当地的流行情况,同样重要的是,了解它们的抗菌耐药模式。尽管一些作者认为任何抗菌药物,甚至安慰剂,对大多数AOM病例都应该足够,但临床实践似乎表明并非如此。阿莫西林仍然是初始非难治性AOM的一线治疗选择,但往往会失败。当临床医生寻找临床数据来为治疗失败选择抗菌药物时,真正的困境就开始了——可用的数据很少。因此,为了给抗菌治疗失败的儿童提供最佳治疗——这是所有二线抗菌药物的真正实际适应证——他们必须熟悉以下体内和体外数据:1. “体内敏感性数据”:也称为细菌学疗效,即在治疗中期进行重复鼓膜穿刺术。这揭示了个体抗菌药物的细菌“阿喀琉斯之踵”或弱点。2. 临床疗效数据:在比较试验中,对最初使用单次鼓膜穿刺术和“金标准”对照抗菌药物治疗后的临床治愈率进行分析。3. “细菌与药物”数据:比较每种个体抗菌药物报告的中耳浓度与分离株各自的最低抑菌浓度,特别是耐药肺炎球菌和流感嗜血杆菌(如果可能,从儿科呼吸道获得)。在任何特定病例中选择AOM的抗菌药物不应仅仅是一个随机过程。它需要了解最有可能观察到的病原体:合并感染时;在使用特定抗菌药物失败后(该药物的细菌“阿喀琉斯之踵”);以及在不同时间点,无论是最初还是治疗失败后(例如一线治疗失败与四线治疗失败)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验