Linzer M, Konrad T R, Douglas J, McMurray J E, Pathman D E, Williams E S, Schwartz M D, Gerrity M, Scheckler W, Bigby J A, Rhodes E
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53705, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jul;15(7):441-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.05239.x.
To assess the association between HMO practice, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction.
National random stratified sample of 5,704 primary care and specialty physicians in the United States. Surveys contained 150 items reflecting 10 facets (components) of satisfaction in addition to global satisfaction with current job, one's career and one's specialty. Linear regression-modeled satisfaction (on 1-5 scale) as a function of specialty, practice setting (solo, small group, large group, academic, or HMO), gender, ethnicity, full-time versus part-time status, and time pressure during office visits. "HMO physicians" (9% of total) were those in group or staff model HMOs with > 50% of patients capitated or in managed care.
Of the 2,326 respondents, 735 (32%) were female, 607 (26%) were minority (adjusted response rate 52%). HMO physicians reported significantly higher satisfaction with autonomy and administrative issues when compared with other practice types (moderate to large effect sizes). However, physicians in many other practice settings averaged higher satisfaction than HMO physicians with resources and relationships with staff and community (small to moderate effect sizes). Small and large group practice and academic physicians had higher global job satisfaction scores than HMO physicians (P <.05), and private practice physicians had quarter to half the odds of HMO physicians of intending to leave their current practice within 2 years (P <.05). Time pressure detracted from satisfaction in 7 of 10 satisfaction facets (P <.05) and from job, career, and specialty satisfaction (P <.01). Time allotted for new patients in HMOs (31 min) was less than that allotted in solo (39 min) and academic practices (44 min), while 83% of family physicians in HMOs felt they needed more time than allotted for new patients versus 54% of family physicians in small group practices (P <.05 after Bonferroni's correction).
HMO physicians are generally less satisfied with their jobs and more likely to intend to leave their practices than physicians in many other practice settings. Our data suggest that HMO physicians' satisfaction with staff, community, resources, and the duration of new patient visits should be assessed and optimized. Whether providing more time for patient encounters would improve job satisfaction in HMOs or other practice settings remains to be determined.
评估健康维护组织(HMO)执业模式、时间压力与医生工作满意度之间的关联。
对美国5704名初级保健医生和专科医生进行全国随机分层抽样调查。调查问卷包含150个项目,除了对当前工作、职业和专业的总体满意度外,还反映了满意度的10个方面(组成部分)。采用线性回归模型,将满意度(1 - 5分制)作为专业、执业环境(个体执业、小团体执业、大团体执业、学术机构或HMO)、性别、种族、全职与兼职状态以及门诊时间压力的函数进行分析。“HMO医生”(占总数的9%)是指在团体或员工模式HMO中,50%以上患者采用按人头付费或参与管理式医疗的医生。
在2326名受访者中,735名(32%)为女性,607名(26%)为少数族裔(调整后的回复率为52%)。与其他执业类型相比,HMO医生对自主权和行政事务的满意度显著更高(效应量为中等至较大)。然而,在资源以及与员工和社区的关系方面,许多其他执业环境中的医生平均满意度高于HMO医生(效应量为小至中等)。小团体和大团体执业医生以及学术机构医生的总体工作满意度得分高于HMO医生(P <.05),私人执业医生在两年内打算离开当前执业岗位的几率仅为HMO医生的四分之一至二分之一(P <.05)。时间压力降低了10个满意度方面中7个方面的满意度(P <.05),以及工作、职业和专业满意度(P <.01)。HMO为新患者安排的时间(31分钟)少于个体执业(39分钟)和学术机构执业(44分钟),而HMO中83%的家庭医生认为他们需要比为新患者安排的更多时间,相比之下,小团体执业中这一比例为54%(经邦费罗尼校正后P <.05)。
与许多其他执业环境中的医生相比,HMO医生对工作的总体满意度通常较低,且更有可能打算离开其执业岗位。我们的数据表明,应该对HMO医生对员工、社区、资源以及新患者就诊时长的满意度进行评估并加以优化。在HMO或其他执业环境中,增加患者诊疗时间是否会提高工作满意度仍有待确定。