• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节中心位置错误对步态分析结果的影响。

Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait analysis results.

作者信息

Stagni R, Leardini A, Cappozzo A, Grazia Benedetti M, Cappello A

机构信息

Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informatica e Sistemistica, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Viale Risorgimento, 2-40136, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2000 Nov;33(11):1479-87. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00093-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00093-2
PMID:10940407
Abstract

Methods to determine the hip joint centre (HJC) location are necessary in gait analysis. It has been demonstrated that the methods proposed in the literature involve large mislocation errors. The choice should be made according to the extent by which HJC location errors distort the estimates of angles and resultant moments at the hip and knee joints. This study aimed at quantifying how mislocation errors propagate to these gait analysis results. Angles and moments at the hip and knee joint were calculated for five able-bodied subjects during level walking. The nominal position of the HJC was determined as the position of the pivot point of a 3D movement of the thigh relative to the pelvis. Angles and moments were then re-calculated after having added to HJC co-ordinates errors in the range of +/-30 mm. Angles and moments at both hip and knee joints were affected by HJC mislocation. The hip moments showed the largest propagation error: a 30 mm HJC anterior mislocation resulted in a propagated error into flexion/extension component of about -22%. The hip abduction/adduction moment was found the second largest affected quantity: a 30 mm lateral HJC mislocation produced a propagated error of about -15%. Finally, a 30 mm posterior HJC mislocation produced a delay of the flexion-to-extension timing in the order of 25% of the stride duration. HJC estimation methods with minimum antero-posterior error should therefore be preferred.

摘要

在步态分析中,确定髋关节中心(HJC)位置的方法是必要的。已有文献表明,文献中提出的方法存在较大的定位误差。应根据HJC位置误差对髋关节和膝关节角度及合力矩估计值的扭曲程度来进行选择。本研究旨在量化定位误差如何传播到这些步态分析结果中。在平地行走过程中,对五名身体健全的受试者的髋关节和膝关节角度及力矩进行了计算。HJC的标称位置被确定为大腿相对于骨盆三维运动的枢轴点位置。然后在HJC坐标中添加±30 mm范围内的误差后,重新计算角度和力矩。髋关节和膝关节的角度及力矩均受HJC定位误差的影响。髋关节力矩的传播误差最大:HJC向前错位30 mm会导致屈伸分量的传播误差约为-22%。髋关节外展/内收力矩是受影响第二大的量:HJC向外侧错位30 mm会产生约-15%的传播误差。最后,HJC向后错位30 mm会使屈伸时间延迟约为步幅持续时间的25%。因此,应优先选择前后误差最小的HJC估计方法。

相似文献

1
Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait analysis results.髋关节中心位置错误对步态分析结果的影响。
J Biomech. 2000 Nov;33(11):1479-87. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00093-2.
2
Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait kinematics of children with cerebral palsy calculated using patient-specific direct and inverse kinematic models.使用患者特异性直接和逆运动学模型计算髋关节中心错位对脑瘫儿童步态运动学的影响。
Gait Posture. 2017 Sep;57:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 4.
3
Verification of an improved hip joint center prediction method.一种改进的髋关节中心预测方法的验证
Gait Posture. 2018 Jan;59:174-176. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
Contributions to the understanding of gait control.对步态控制理解的贡献。
Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4823.
5
A normative database of hip and knee joint biomechanics during dynamic tasks using anatomical regression prediction methods.一个使用解剖回归预测方法的动态任务期间髋关节和膝关节生物力学的规范数据库。
J Biomech. 2018 Nov 16;81:122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
6
In-vivo quantification of dynamic hip joint center errors and soft tissue artifact.动态髋关节中心误差和软组织伪影的体内定量分析
Gait Posture. 2016 Oct;50:246-251. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 11.
7
The effect on conventional gait model kinematics and kinetics of hip joint centre equations in adult healthy gait.成人健康步态中髋关节中心方程对常规步态模型运动学和动力学的影响。
J Biomech. 2019 Apr 18;87:167-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
8
Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait.特定个体的髋关节几何形状和髋关节中心位置会影响步态期间髋关节处计算得出的接触力。
J Biomech. 2009 Jun 19;42(9):1246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.037. Epub 2009 May 21.
9
Evaluation of Anatomical and Functional Hip Joint Center Methods: The Effects of Activity Type, Gender, and Proximal Reference Segment.解剖学和功能性髋关节中心方法的评估:活动类型、性别和近端参考节段的影响
J Biomech Eng. 2016 Jan;138(1). doi: 10.1115/1.4032054.
10
Joint contact forces can be reduced by improving joint moment symmetry in below-knee amputee gait simulations.在膝下截肢者步态模拟中,通过改善关节力矩对称性可降低关节接触力。
Gait Posture. 2016 Sep;49:219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling and prediction of body segment inertial properties of sheep from tomographic imaging.基于断层成像的绵羊身体各部分惯性特性建模与预测
J Biomech. 2025 Sep;190:112848. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112848. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
2
Comparison of lower limb kinematic and kinetic estimation during athlete jumping between markerless and marker-based motion capture systems.无标记和基于标记的运动捕捉系统在运动员跳跃过程中下肢运动学和动力学估计的比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 27;15(1):18552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02739-9.
3
A leg model based on anatomical landmarks to study 3D joint kinematics of walking in .
一种基于解剖学标志的腿部模型,用于研究步行中的三维关节运动学。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 26;12:1357598. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1357598. eCollection 2024.
4
Development of a simulation system for femoroacetabular impingement detection based on 3D images.基于3D图像的股骨髋臼撞击检测模拟系统的开发
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2023 Nov 11;11(1):20-29. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnad037. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Influence of Skin Marker Positioning and Their Combinations on Hip Joint Center Estimation Using the Functional Method.皮肤标记点定位及其组合对采用功能法估计髋关节中心的影响。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;11(3):297. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11030297.
6
Comparison of kinematics and joint moments calculations for lower limbs during gait using markerless and marker-based motion capture.使用无标记和基于标记的运动捕捉技术对步态期间下肢的运动学和关节力矩计算进行比较。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Mar 12;12:1280363. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1280363. eCollection 2024.
7
Differences between lower extremity joint running kinetics captured by marker-based and markerless systems were speed dependent.基于标记和无标记系统捕捉到的下肢关节跑步动力学的差异与速度有关。
J Sport Health Sci. 2024 Jul;13(4):569-578. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
8
Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements.无标记运动捕捉估计下肢运动学和动力学与基于标记的在 8 种运动中具有可比性。
J Biomech. 2023 Aug;157:111751. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111751. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
9
Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements.基于无标记运动捕捉的下肢运动学和动力学估计与基于标记的在8种运动中的估计结果具有可比性。
bioRxiv. 2023 Feb 22:2023.02.21.526496. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.21.526496.
10
Comparison of Lower Extremity Joint Moment and Power Estimated by Markerless and Marker-Based Systems during Treadmill Running.跑步机跑步过程中基于无标记和基于标记系统估计的下肢关节力矩和功率比较。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Oct 19;9(10):574. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100574.