Patterson T F, Kirkpatrick W R, White M, Hiemenz J W, Wingard J R, Dupont B, Rinaldi M G, Stevens D A, Graybill J R
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7881, USA.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2000 Jul;79(4):250-60. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200007000-00006.
A review of representative cases of invasive aspergillosis was conducted to describe current treatment practices and outcomes. Eighty-nine physicians experienced with aspergillosis completed case forms on 595 patients with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis diagnosed using modifications of the Mycoses Study Group criteria. Pulmonary disease was present in 56%, with disseminated infection in 19%. The major risk factors for aspergillosis were bone marrow transplantation (32%) and hematologic malignancy (29%), but patients had a variety of underlying conditions including solid organ transplants (9%), AIDS (8%), and pulmonary diseases (9%). Overall, high antifungal failure rates occurred (36%), and complete antifungal responses were noted in only 27%. Treatment practices revealed that amphotericin B alone (187 patients) was used in most severely immunosuppressed patients while itraconazole alone (58 patients) or sequential amphotericin B followed by itraconazole (93 patients) was used in patients who were less immunosuppressed than patients receiving amphotericin B alone. Response rate for patients receiving amphotericin B alone was poor, with complete responses noted in only 25% and death due to or with aspergillosis in 65%. In contrast, patients receiving itraconazole alone or following amphotericin B had death due to or with Aspergillus in 26% and 36%, respectively. These results confirm that mortality from invasive aspergillosis in severely immunosuppressed patients remains high even with standard amphotericin B. Improved responses were seen in the less immunosuppressed patients receiving sequential amphotericin B followed by itraconazole and those receiving itraconazole alone. New approaches and new therapies are needed to improve the outcome of invasive aspergillosis in high-risk patients.
对侵袭性曲霉病的代表性病例进行了回顾,以描述当前的治疗方法和结果。89名有曲霉病治疗经验的医生填写了595例经证实或可能患有侵袭性曲霉病患者的病例表格,这些病例是根据真菌病研究组标准的修订版诊断出来的。56%的患者患有肺部疾病,19%的患者有播散性感染。曲霉病的主要危险因素是骨髓移植(32%)和血液系统恶性肿瘤(29%),但患者有多种基础疾病,包括实体器官移植(9%)、艾滋病(8%)和肺部疾病(9%)。总体而言,抗真菌治疗失败率较高(36%),仅有27%的患者出现完全抗真菌反应。治疗方法显示,大多数严重免疫抑制患者单独使用两性霉素B(187例患者),而免疫抑制程度低于单独使用两性霉素B患者的患者则单独使用伊曲康唑(58例患者)或先使用两性霉素B后序贯使用伊曲康唑(93例患者)。单独接受两性霉素B治疗的患者缓解率较差,仅有25%的患者出现完全缓解,65%的患者死于曲霉病或因曲霉病死亡。相比之下,单独接受伊曲康唑治疗或在两性霉素B之后接受伊曲康唑治疗的患者,因曲霉病或合并曲霉病死亡的比例分别为26%和36%。这些结果证实,即使使用标准的两性霉素B,严重免疫抑制患者侵袭性曲霉病的死亡率仍然很高。在免疫抑制程度较低的患者中,先使用两性霉素B后序贯使用伊曲康唑以及单独使用伊曲康唑的患者有更好的反应。需要新的方法和新的治疗手段来改善高危患者侵袭性曲霉病的治疗结果。