Suppr超能文献

射血分数-速度比值的验证:一种用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的新型简化“功能校正”指标。

Validation of the ejection fraction-velocity ratio: a new simplified "function-corrected" index for assessing aortic stenosis severity.

作者信息

Antonini-Canterin F, Pavan D, Burelli C, Cassin M, Cervesato E, Nicolosi G L

机构信息

Divisione di Cardiologia, ARC, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2000 Aug 15;86(4):427-33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00959-0.

Abstract

A new echocardiographic method for the evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) severity has recently been introduced: the fractional shortening-velocity ratio (FSVR = fractional shortening/4 Vmax(2)). An important advantage of the method is the possibility of avoiding the difficulties related to the measurement of left ventricular outflow tract in calcific AS for assessing the continuity equation. FSVR, however, also shows some significant limitations especially in patients with regional wall motion abnormalities and conduction defects. To overcome this problem, we developed a new index: the ejection fraction-velocity ratio (EFVR = ejection fraction/4 Vmax(2)), where percent ejection fraction and Vmax have been obtained with an apical echocardiographic approach. In 343 consecutive patients with AS, aortic valve area was measured by cardiac catheterization (Gorlin), whereas FSVR and EFVR were calculated by echo-Doppler examination performed within 24 hours. Mean valve area was 0.70 +/- 0.30 cm(2), mean EFVR was 0.78 +/- 0.41, and mean FSVR was 0.45 +/- 0.26. The linear correlation area-EFVR was highly significant (r = 0.88). Correlation valve area-FSVR was also significant (r = 0.82). EFVR allowed identification of patients with severe AS (area </=0.8 cm(2)) with good sensitivity (88%) and specificity (85%), whereas FSVR demonstrated sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 73%. Thus, the EFVR, a very simple and not time-consuming index, is strongly related to aortic valve area in patients with AS. It allows identification of patients with severe AS with good sensitivity and specificity (better than FSVR). The EFVR, taking into consideration both ejection fraction and transvalvular pressure gradient, may be very useful in the evaluation of patients with AS and left ventricular dysfunction.

摘要

最近引入了一种用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)严重程度的新超声心动图方法:缩短分数 - 速度比(FSVR = 缩短分数/4Vmax²)。该方法的一个重要优点是,在评估连续性方程时,有可能避免钙化性AS中左心室流出道测量相关的困难。然而,FSVR也存在一些显著局限性,特别是在有节段性室壁运动异常和传导缺陷的患者中。为克服这一问题,我们开发了一种新指标:射血分数 - 速度比(EFVR = 射血分数/4Vmax²),其中射血分数百分比和Vmax通过心尖超声心动图方法获得。在343例连续的AS患者中,通过心导管检查(戈林法)测量主动脉瓣面积,而FSVR和EFVR通过在24小时内进行的超声多普勒检查计算得出。平均瓣膜面积为0.70±0.30cm²,平均EFVR为0.78±0.41,平均FSVR为0.45±0.26。面积与EFVR的线性相关性非常显著(r = 0.88)。瓣膜面积与FSVR的相关性也很显著(r = 0.82)。EFVR能够以良好的敏感性(88%)和特异性(85%)识别重度AS患者(面积≤0.8cm²),而FSVR的敏感性为88%,特异性为73%。因此,EFVR是一个非常简单且不耗时的指标,与AS患者的主动脉瓣面积密切相关。它能够以良好的敏感性和特异性(优于FSVR)识别重度AS患者。考虑到射血分数和跨瓣压力梯度的EFVR,在评估AS和左心室功能障碍患者时可能非常有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验