McCann R S, Remington R W, Van Selst M
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, USA.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Aug;26(4):1352-70.
An analysis of activation models of visual word processing suggests that frequency-sensitive forms of lexical processing should proceed normally while unattended. This hypothesis was tested by having participants perform a speeded pitch discrimination task followed by lexical decisions or word naming. As the stimulus onset asynchrony between the tasks was reduced, lexical-decision and naming latencies increased dramatically. Word-frequency effects were additive with the increase, indicating that frequency-sensitive processing was subject to postponement while attention was devoted to the other task. Either (a) the same neural hardware shares responsibility for lexical processing and central stages of choice reaction time task processing and cannot perform both computations simultaneously, or (b) lexical processing is blocked in order to optimize performance on the pitch discrimination task. Either way, word processing is not as automatic as activation models suggest.
对视觉单词处理激活模型的分析表明,频率敏感型的词汇处理形式在未被注意时应能正常进行。通过让参与者执行一项快速音高辨别任务,随后进行词汇判断或单词命名,对这一假设进行了测试。随着两项任务之间的刺激起始异步性降低,词汇判断和命名潜伏期大幅增加。单词频率效应随着增加而累加,表明在注意力集中于另一任务时,频率敏感型处理会被推迟。要么(a)相同的神经硬件负责词汇处理和选择反应时任务处理的中枢阶段,且无法同时执行这两种计算,要么(b)词汇处理被阻断,以便优化音高辨别任务的表现。不管哪种方式,单词处理都不像激活模型所表明的那样自动。