• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显示和任务相关集大小对干扰项干扰的认知位点:来自双任务范式的证据。

The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.

作者信息

Park Bo Youn, Kim Sujin, Cho Yang Seok

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):337-351. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1442-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-017-1442-2
PMID:29124674
Abstract

The congruency effect of a task-irrelevant distractor has been found to be modulated by task-relevant set size and display set size. The present study used a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm to examine the cognitive loci of the display set size effect (dilution effect) and the task-relevant set size effect (perceptual load effect) on distractor interference. A tone discrimination task (Task 1), in which a response was made to the pitch of the target tone, was followed by a letter discrimination task (Task 2) in which different types of visual target display were used. In Experiment 1, in which display set size was manipulated to examine the nature of the display set size effect on distractor interference in Task 2, the modulation of the congruency effect by display set size was observed at both short and long stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs), indicating that the display set size effect occurred after the target was selected for processing in the focused attention stage. In Experiment 2, in which task-relevant set size was manipulated to examine the nature of the task-relevant set size effect on distractor interference in Task 2, the effects of task-relevant set size increased with SOA, suggesting that the target selection efficiency in the preattentive stage was impaired with increasing task-relevant set size. These results suggest that display set size and task-relevant set size modulate distractor processing in different ways.

摘要

研究发现,与任务无关的干扰项的一致性效应会受到与任务相关的集合大小和显示集合大小的调节。本研究采用心理不应期(PRP)范式,来检验显示集合大小效应(稀释效应)和与任务相关的集合大小效应(知觉负载效应)对干扰项干扰的认知位点。先进行一个音调辨别任务(任务1),即对目标音调的音高做出反应,随后进行一个字母辨别任务(任务2),其中使用了不同类型的视觉目标显示。在实验1中,通过操纵显示集合大小来检验显示集合大小效应在任务2中对干扰项干扰的本质,在短和长刺激起始异步(SOA)条件下均观察到显示集合大小对一致性效应的调节,这表明显示集合大小效应发生在目标在聚焦注意阶段被选择进行加工之后。在实验2中,通过操纵与任务相关的集合大小来检验与任务相关的集合大小效应在任务2中对干扰项干扰的本质,与任务相关的集合大小的效应随SOA增加,这表明随着与任务相关的集合大小增加,前注意阶段的目标选择效率受损。这些结果表明,显示集合大小和与任务相关的集合大小以不同方式调节干扰项加工。

相似文献

1
The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.显示和任务相关集大小对干扰项干扰的认知位点:来自双任务范式的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):337-351. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1442-2.
2
More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.对双重任务中反应选择与视觉注意相互作用的更多洞察:掩蔽视觉搜索和反应选择是并行进行的。
Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):459-475. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0906-2. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
3
Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.视觉、听觉和触觉中的跨模态心理不应期。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1573-1585. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-01978-4.
4
Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.压力提高双任务中的任务处理效率。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Sep 1;252:260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing.稀释而非负荷影响分心物处理。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):319-35. doi: 10.1037/a0021433.
6
Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.图片命名中的语义干扰焦点:来自双重任务表现的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):147-65. doi: 10.1037/a0033745. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
7
Investigating dual-task interference in children versus young adults with the overlapping task paradigm.采用重叠任务范式研究儿童与青年成年人的双重任务干扰。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Sep;197:104866. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104866. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.在心理不应期范式中,全局-局部加工与特质偏向和情绪加工相互作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Feb;238(2):345-354. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05716-7. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.观察者视角会影响空间平移任务中的中央瓶颈要求。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Apr;34(2):398-412. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.398.
10
Processing two tasks with varying task order: central stage duration influences central processing order.以不同任务顺序处理两项任务:中央阶段持续时间影响中央处理顺序。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 May;137(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Slippage theory and the flanker paradigm: an early-selection account of selective attention failures.滑动理论与侧翼范式:选择性注意失败的早期选择解释
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):1257-73. doi: 10.1037/a0036179. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
2
Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.注意定势会影响知觉负载效应,但不会影响稀释效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(4):785-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.830629. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
3
Visual salience can co-exist with dilution during visual selection.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):7-14. doi: 10.1037/a0033922. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
4
Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.图片命名中的语义干扰焦点:来自双重任务表现的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):147-65. doi: 10.1037/a0033745. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
5
Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.知觉负载与稀释:注意焦点、刺激类别和目标可预测性的作用。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 7;4:327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00327. eCollection 2013.
6
Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: implications for the perceptual load theory.注意的跨半球内选择:对知觉负载理论的启示。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3346-7. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
7
Two mechanisms of distractor dilution: visual selection in a continuous flow.两种分心物稀释机制:连续流中的视觉选择。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun;39(3):872-92. doi: 10.1037/a0030486. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
8
Object-based attention overrides perceptual load to modulate visual distraction.基于对象的注意力可以覆盖感知负载,从而调节视觉干扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):576-9. doi: 10.1037/a0027406. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
9
Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing.稀释而非负荷影响分心物处理。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):319-35. doi: 10.1037/a0021433.
10
Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).稀释:理论负担还是仅仅是负担?对 Tsal 和 Benoni(2010)的回复。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. doi: 10.1037/a0020733.