Danzon P M, Chao L W
Health Care Management Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
J Health Econ. 2000 Mar;19(2):159-95. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00039-9.
Bilateral drug price and quantity indexes, based on comprehensive data for seven countries (US, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the UK), refute the conventional wisdom that US drug prices are much higher than elsewhere, for Laspeyres (US-weighted) indexes. Previous drug-price comparisons are biased by unrepresentative samples and unweighted indexes. Quasi-hedonic regression shows that cross-national price differences reflect differences in product characteristics and in their implicit prices, which reflect the regulatory regime. Strict price regulation systematically lowers prices for older molecules and globally diffused molecules. Generic competition lowers prices in less-regulated regimes, which also have more price-elastic demand.
基于七个国家(美国、加拿大、法国、德国、意大利、日本和英国)的综合数据得出的双边药品价格和数量指数,驳斥了传统观点,即就拉氏(以美国为权重)指数而言,美国药品价格远高于其他国家。以往的药品价格比较受到不具代表性的样本和未加权指数的影响。准享乐回归表明,跨国价格差异反映了产品特征及其隐含价格的差异,而隐含价格又反映了监管制度。严格的价格监管系统性地降低了老药分子和全球普及分子的价格。仿制药竞争在监管较松的制度下降低了价格,而这些制度下的需求价格弹性也更大。