• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初发性高血压患者出现恶性高血压时与既往已知高血压患者有何不同?

Do patients with de novo hypertension differ from patients with previously known hypertension when malignant phase hypertension occurs?

作者信息

Lip G Y, Beevers M, Beevers D G

机构信息

University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, England.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2000 Aug;13(8):934-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00283-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00283-6
PMID:10950403
Abstract

Malignant phase hypertension (MHT) represents the most severe form of hypertension, and many consider that this condition only occurs in poorly managed patients with previously known hypertension. To investigate this further, we studied 350 patients with MHT on the West Birmingham MHT database: 195 (55.7%) of these presented de novo, without any known past history of hypertension (Group 1), and 146 (41.7%) were previously known hypertensives (Group 2), of whom 86 were receiving antihypertensive therapy; in 9 patients, the status was uncertain. Median duration of clinical followup was similar in both groups (36.0 v 37.5 months, Mann-Whitney test P = .795). Patients presenting de novo with MHT (Group 1) were younger, with a predominance of whites and men. Nevertheless, the clinical features, blood pressures, and renal function at presentation were similar to MHT patients with previously known hypertension. Renal function at follow-up was also similar in both groups. There was an excess of women and nonwhites in MHT patients with previously known hypertension (Group 2), who also had higher mean follow-up blood pressures. On univariate life-table analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in survival time between Groups 1 and 2 (mean 57.5 v 63.5 months, median 36.0 v 37.0 months; log-rank test, P = .456). Using a multivariate Cox analysis of baseline variables, the independent predictors of outcome (death or dialysis) were age at presentation (P = .0019), diastolic blood pressure (P = .0466), serum urea (P = .006), and serum creatinine (P < .001). Whether the patient had presented de novo, without any known history of hypertension (Group 1) or had previously known hypertension (Group 2) did not independently predict outcome (P = .6549). We suggest that MHT can occur de novo in patients without previously known hypertension, and the clinical characteristics and prognosis in such patients were similar to MHT patients with previously known hypertension.

摘要

恶性期高血压(MHT)是高血压最严重的形式,许多人认为这种情况仅发生在高血压管理不善的已知高血压患者中。为进一步研究这一情况,我们对西米德兰兹郡MHT数据库中的350例MHT患者进行了研究:其中195例(55.7%)为新发患者,既往无高血压病史(第1组),146例(41.7%)为已知高血压患者(第2组),其中86例正在接受抗高血压治疗;9例患者的情况不明。两组的临床随访中位持续时间相似(36.0对37.5个月,Mann-Whitney检验P = 0.795)。新发MHT患者(第1组)较年轻,以白人和男性为主。然而,就诊时的临床特征、血压和肾功能与已知高血压的MHT患者相似。随访时两组的肾功能也相似。已知高血压的MHT患者(第2组)中女性和非白人较多,其平均随访血压也较高。单变量生命表分析显示,第1组和第2组的生存时间无统计学显著差异(平均57.5对63.5个月,中位36.0对37.0个月;对数秩检验,P = 0.456)。使用多变量Cox分析基线变量,结局(死亡或透析)的独立预测因素为就诊时年龄(P = 0.0019)、舒张压(P = 0.0466)、血清尿素(P = 0.006)和血清肌酐(P < 0.001)。患者是新发且无高血压病史(第1组)还是已知高血压(第2组)并不能独立预测结局(P = 0.6549)。我们认为,MHT可在无既往高血压病史的患者中新发,此类患者的临床特征和预后与已知高血压的MHT患者相似。

相似文献

1
Do patients with de novo hypertension differ from patients with previously known hypertension when malignant phase hypertension occurs?初发性高血压患者出现恶性高血压时与既往已知高血压患者有何不同?
Am J Hypertens. 2000 Aug;13(8):934-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00283-6.
2
Serum urate is associated with baseline renal dysfunction but not survival or deterioration in renal function in malignant phase hypertension.血清尿酸与恶性高血压患者的基线肾功能不全有关,但与肾功能的生存或恶化无关。
J Hypertens. 2000 Jan;18(1):97-101. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200018010-00014.
3
Does renal function improve after diagnosis of malignant phase hypertension?恶性高血压诊断后肾功能会改善吗?
J Hypertens. 1997 Nov;15(11):1309-15. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715110-00016.
4
Severe hypertension with lone bilateral papilloedema: a variant of malignant hypertension.伴有单纯双侧视乳头水肿的重度高血压:恶性高血压的一种变体
Blood Press. 1995 Nov;4(6):339-42. doi: 10.3109/08037059509077618.
5
Malignant hypertension in young women is related to previous hypertension in pregnancy, not oral contraception.年轻女性的恶性高血压与既往妊娠高血压有关,而非口服避孕药。
QJM. 1997 Sep;90(9):571-5. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/90.9.571.
6
Vascular ventricular coupling in patients with malignant phase hypertension: the West Birmingham malignant hypertension project.恶性高血压病患者的血管-心室偶联:西英国恶性高血压病项目。
Hypertens Res. 2012 Jul;35(7):725-8. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.18. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7
Malignant hypertension in the elderly.老年人恶性高血压
QJM. 1995 Sep;88(9):641-7.
8
Complications and survival of 315 patients with malignant-phase hypertension.315例恶性高血压患者的并发症与生存率
J Hypertens. 1995 Aug;13(8):915-24. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199508000-00013.
9
Factors influencing mortality in malignant hypertension.影响恶性高血压死亡率的因素。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1985 Dec;3(3):S405-7.
10
A comprehensive assessment of cardiac structure and function in patients with treated malignant phase hypertension: the West Birmingham Malignant Hypertension project.治疗后恶性高血压患者心脏结构和功能的综合评估:西伯明翰恶性高血压项目。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;167(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.077. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Management of Hypertensive Emergencies-Is There a "Magical" Prescription for All?高血压急症的管理——是否存在适用于所有人的“神奇”处方?
J Clin Med. 2022 May 31;11(11):3138. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113138.
2
Malignant hypertension: does this still exist?恶性高血压:它如今仍然存在吗?
J Hum Hypertens. 2020 Jan;34(1):1-4. doi: 10.1038/s41371-019-0267-y. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
3
CD4(+)CD25(+) T Cells in primary malignant hypertension related kidney injury.原发性恶性高血压相关肾损伤中的CD4(+)CD25(+) T细胞
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 9;6:27659. doi: 10.1038/srep27659.
4
From malignant hypertension to hypertension-MOD: a modern definition for an old but still dangerous emergency.从恶性高血压到高血压急症伴多器官功能障碍:一个针对古老但依然危险的急症的现代定义。
J Hum Hypertens. 2016 Aug;30(8):463-6. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2015.112. Epub 2015 Nov 19.