• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幽门螺杆菌根除两种策略的成本效益分析:一项初级保健前瞻性随机研究的结果

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of 2 strategies of Helicobacter pylori eradication: results of a prospective and randomized study in primary care].

作者信息

Gomollón F, Valdepérez J, Garuz R, Fuentes J, Barrera F, Malo J, Tirado M, Simón M A

机构信息

Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 2000 Jun 3;115(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(00)71447-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0025-7753(00)71447-3
PMID:10953829
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To analyze cost-effectiveness of two different strategies to treat H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer in the primary care setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with endoscopic diagnosis of peptic ulcer were randomized to one of two strategies: a) treatment during 7 days with omeprazole, tetracycline, metronidazole and bismuth subcitrate ("quadruple" therapy) and if failure second-line treatment with omeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin during 7 days (OCA7), and b) initial treatment with OCA7 and if failure treatment with "quadruple therapy". End point was eradication 8 weeks after last treatment dose. Direct and indirect costs were estimated (euros, 1997) and a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision-tree model was undertaken after real clinical data. 95% confidence intervals are given.

RESULTS

After screening 255 patients, 97 were finally included. 48 patients were given strategy a and 49 strategy b. Eradication was obtained (intention-to-treat) in 72.9% (CI 95%: 58.2-84.7) in group a versus 91.8% (CI 95%: 80.4-97.7) (p < 0.05) in group b. Mean cost per case treated was lower in group a (237 versus 268 euros) but cost per case eradicated was lower in group b (320 versus 296 euros). The cost was primarily determined by efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with OCA7 followed by rescue with "quadruple" therapy if failure is more efficient in our area that the inverse strategy. Efficiency is mostly determined by efficacy.

摘要

背景

分析在基层医疗环境中治疗消化性溃疡幽门螺杆菌感染的两种不同策略的成本效益。

患者与方法

经内镜诊断为消化性溃疡的连续患者被随机分为两种策略之一:a)使用奥美拉唑、四环素、甲硝唑和枸橼酸铋钾进行7天治疗(“四联”疗法),若治疗失败则在7天内使用奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素进行二线治疗(OCA7);b)初始使用OCA7治疗,若治疗失败则使用“四联疗法”。终点为最后一剂治疗后8周的根除情况。估算了直接和间接成本(1997年欧元),并根据实际临床数据使用决策树模型进行了成本效益分析。给出了95%置信区间。

结果

在筛查255例患者后,最终纳入97例。48例患者采用策略a,49例采用策略b。a组的根除率(意向性治疗)为72.9%(95%CI:58.2 - 84.7),b组为91.8%(95%CI:80.4 - 97.7)(p < 0.05)。a组每例治疗的平均成本较低(237欧元对268欧元),但b组每例根除的成本较低(320欧元对296欧元)。成本主要由疗效决定。

结论

在我们地区,先使用OCA7治疗,若失败则采用“四联疗法”挽救的策略比相反策略更有效。效率主要由疗效决定。

相似文献

1
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of 2 strategies of Helicobacter pylori eradication: results of a prospective and randomized study in primary care].幽门螺杆菌根除两种策略的成本效益分析:一项初级保健前瞻性随机研究的结果
Med Clin (Barc). 2000 Jun 3;115(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(00)71447-3.
2
[Helicobacter pylori eradication in gastroduodenal ulcer: good, fine and not expensive].[根除幽门螺杆菌治疗胃十二指肠溃疡:效果良好、费用低廉]
Med Clin (Barc). 2000 Jun 3;115(1):23-4. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(00)71451-5.
3
Pharmacological effects of metronidazole+tetracycline+bismuth subcitrate versus omeprazole+amoxycillin+bismuth subcitrate in Helicobacter pylori-related gastritis and peptic ulcer disease.甲硝唑+四环素+枸橼酸铋钾与奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+枸橼酸铋钾治疗幽门螺杆菌相关性胃炎和消化性溃疡疾病的药理作用比较
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1994 Dec;6 Suppl 1:S103-7.
4
Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication triple therapy vs. conventional therapy for ulcers in Japan.日本幽门螺杆菌根除三联疗法与传统溃疡治疗方法的成本效益评估。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Nov;15(11):1777-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01106.x.
5
[new one-week triple therapies with metronidazole for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: clarithromycin or amoxycillin as the second antibiotic].[采用甲硝唑的新型一周三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌:以克拉霉素或阿莫西林作为第二种抗生素]
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Jan 17;110(1):1-5.
6
Pharmacoeconomic comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens.幽门螺杆菌根除方案的药物经济学比较
Pharm World Sci. 2006 Aug;28(4):207-14. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9021-y. Epub 2006 Oct 26.
7
New single capsule of bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline given with omeprazole versus quadruple therapy consisting of bismuth, omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients: a Chinese prospective, randomized, multicentre trial.铋、甲硝唑和四环素单胶囊联合奥美拉唑与铋、奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素四联疗法治疗十二指肠溃疡患者幽门螺杆菌根除:一项中国前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jun 1;73(6):1681-1687. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky056.
8
Cost-effectiveness of treatment regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer.十二指肠溃疡中根除幽门螺杆菌治疗方案的成本效益
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Feb;91(2):239-45.
9
Omeprazole triple therapy versus omeprazole quadruple therapy for healing duodenal ulcer and eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: a 24-month follow-up study.奥美拉唑三联疗法与奥美拉唑四联疗法治疗十二指肠溃疡愈合及根除幽门螺杆菌感染的24个月随访研究。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Nov;14(11):1237-43. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200211000-00012.
10
Decision analysis of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy using omeprazole with either clarithromycin or amoxicillin.使用奥美拉唑联合克拉霉素或阿莫西林进行幽门螺杆菌根除治疗的决策分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Jul;10(1):79-92. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610010-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacies of triple, quadruple and sequential antibiotic therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection: A randomized controlled trial.三联、四联和序贯抗生素疗法根除幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug;42(4):517-524. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01322-8. Epub 2023 May 17.
2
Comparing the efficacy of four different protocols for eradicating of Helicobacter pylori infection in Ahvaz, southwest Iran.比较伊朗西南部阿瓦士四种不同根除幽门螺杆菌感染方案的疗效。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2015;10(2):94-9. doi: 10.5114/pg.2015.49001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
3
Rescue Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection 2012.
2012 年幽门螺杆菌感染的挽救治疗。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:974594. doi: 10.1155/2012/974594. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
4
Second-line rescue therapy of helicobacter pylori infection.二线补救治疗幽门螺杆菌感染。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;2(6):331-56. doi: 10.1177/1756283X09347109.
5
"Rescue" regimens after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure.幽门螺杆菌治疗失败后的“挽救”方案。
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Sep 21;14(35):5385-402. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5385.
6
H pylori eradication: a randomized prospective study of triple therapy with or without ecabet sodium.幽门螺杆菌根除:一项关于含或不含依卡倍特钠三联疗法的随机前瞻性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb 14;14(6):908-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.908.