Suppr超能文献

宫内节育器与盆腔炎:1974年至1990年已发表研究的荟萃分析

Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: meta-analyses of published studies, 1974-1990.

作者信息

Gareen I F, Greenland S, Morgenstern H

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):589-97. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00016.

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis of 36 papers published between 1974 and 1990 to estimate the effects of intrauterine device (IUD) use and Dalkon Shield use, in particular, on pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). The number of women studied in each report ranged from 50 to 26,507. For general IUD use, analyses were separated by type of PID (symptomatic or asymptomatic) because of extreme rate-ratio heterogeneity across studies. Dalkon Shield rate ratios were more homogeneous and were considered in a single meta-regression. There was substantial heterogeneity, however, in all three meta-regressions; the rate-ratio estimates ranged from 0.51 to 12 for IUD use and symptomatic PID, from 1.0 to 132 for IUD use and asymptomatic PID, and from 0.32 to 28 for Dalkon-Shield use and PID. This heterogeneity appeared to be due to differences in reference groups, study populations, and characteristics of study design. We observed consistent, positive associations of IUD use with both symptomatic and asymptomatic PID. These associations were largest for the Dalkon Shield.

摘要

我们对1974年至1990年间发表的36篇论文进行了荟萃分析,以评估使用宫内节育器(IUD)和使用达康盾(Dalkon Shield),尤其是对盆腔炎(PID)的影响。每份报告中所研究的女性人数从50人至26507人不等。对于一般的宫内节育器使用情况,由于各研究之间的率比存在极大异质性,因此按盆腔炎的类型(有症状或无症状)进行分析。达康盾的率比更为同质,在单一的荟萃回归分析中予以考虑。然而,在所有三项荟萃回归分析中均存在显著的异质性;宫内节育器使用与有症状盆腔炎的率比估计范围为0.51至12,宫内节育器使用与无症状盆腔炎的率比估计范围为1.0至132,达康盾使用与盆腔炎的率比估计范围为0.32至28。这种异质性似乎是由于参照组、研究人群和研究设计特征的差异所致。我们观察到,宫内节育器的使用与有症状和无症状的盆腔炎均存在一致的正相关。这些关联在达康盾中最为显著。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验