荟萃分析中的辛普森悖论。 - Suppr | 超能文献

Simpson's paradox in meta-analysis.

作者信息

Hanley J A, Thériault G

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):613-4. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00022.

DOI:10.1097/00001648-200009000-00022

Abstract

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

相似文献

1

Simpson's paradox in meta-analysis.荟萃分析中的辛普森悖论。

Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):613-4. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00022.

2

Electromagnetic fields and childhood cancer: meta-analysis.

Cancer Causes Control. 1995 May;6(3):275-7; discussion 277-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00051799.

3

Re: "Nighttime exposure to electromagnetic fields and childhood leukemia: an extended pooled analysis".关于：“夜间暴露于电磁场与儿童白血病：一项扩展的汇总分析”

Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Oct 1;166(7):859; author reply 859-60. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm225. Epub 2007 Aug 16.

4

Leukemia, brain tumors, and exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields in Swiss railway employees.瑞士铁路员工中的白血病、脑肿瘤与极低频电磁场暴露

Am J Epidemiol. 2001 May 1;153(9):825-35. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.9.825.

5

Extremely low frequency magnetic fields and cancer.

Eur J Cancer Prev. 1996 Oct;5(5):379-81.

6

The association between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields and childhood leukaemia in epidemiology: enough is enough?流行病学中极低频电磁场与儿童白血病之间的关联：够了吗？

Br J Cancer. 2010 Sep 28;103(7):931-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605837.

7

[How risky is the relative risk in epidemiologic studies?].[流行病学研究中的相对风险有多危险？]

Biomed Tech (Berl). 1997;42 Suppl:107-8. doi: 10.1515/bmte.1997.42.s2.107.

8

Re: "Exposure to residential electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia" and "case-control study of childhood cancer and exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields".

Am J Epidemiol. 1992 May 1;135(9):1070-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116403.

9

When "wire codes" predict cancer better than spot measurements of magnetic fields.

Epidemiology. 1996 May;7(3):217-8.

10

Re: "A pooled analysis of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and childhood brain tumors".关于：“极低频磁场与儿童脑肿瘤的汇总分析”

Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Feb 1;173(3):360, reply 360-1. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq413. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1

Augmenting disease maps: a Bayesian meta-analysis approach.增强疾病地图：一种贝叶斯荟萃分析方法。

R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Aug 5;7(8):192151. doi: 10.1098/rsos.192151. eCollection 2020 Aug.

2

Bench-to-bedside review: avoiding pitfalls in critical care meta-analysis--funnel plots, risk estimates, types of heterogeneity, baseline risk and the ecologic fallacy.从实验台到病床的综述：避免重症监护荟萃分析中的陷阱——漏斗图、风险估计、异质性类型、基线风险及生态学谬误

Crit Care. 2008;12(4):220. doi: 10.1186/cc6941. Epub 2008 Jul 25.

3

Simpson's paradox visualized: the example of the rosiglitazone meta-analysis.辛普森悖论可视化：罗格列酮荟萃分析示例

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 May 30;8:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-34.