Berti M, Casati A, Fanelli G, Albertin A, Palmisano S, Danelli G, Comotti L, Torri G
University of Milan, Department of Anesthesiology, Italy.
J Clin Anesth. 2000 Jun;12(4):292-7. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00154-9.
To evaluate the effects of adding low concentration of fentanyl to 0.2% ropivacaine when providing patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) outside the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Inpatients at a University Department of Anesthesia.
32 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, who were scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery, including bowel resection, hepatic resection, and pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Patients received standard general/epidural anesthesia. After surgery patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind fashion to receive PCEA with either 0.2% ropivacaine (n = 16) or 0.2% ropivacaine/2 microg/mL fentanyl (n = 16) [background infusion ranging between 4 and 6 mL/hr, with 1.5-mL incremental doses and a 20-min lock-out time]. Dynamic pain during coughing, sedation, pulse oxymetry, hemodynamic variables, and motor block were evaluated at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the end of surgery by a blinded observer. Occurrence of untoward events, including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, need for supplemental oxygen (for SpO(2) < 90%), and respiratory complications, as well as total consumption of PCEA solution and incremental doses given to the patient were also recorded.
No differences in pain relief, motor block, degree of sedation, recovery of gastrointestinal motility, and other side effects were observed between the two groups. Patients receiving 0.2% ropivacaine alone requested far more incremental doses (23 doses [0-60] vs. 5 doses [0-25]) (p = 0.006) and needed far more analgesic solution (230 mL [140-282] vs. 204 [130-228]) (p = 0.003) than patients receiving the ropivacaine/fentanyl mixture. Peripheral oxygen saturation was lower at 12, 24, and 48 hours during ropivacaine/fentanyl infusion than in patients receiving ropivacaine alone (12 h: 91% +/- 2% vs. 95% +/- 2%, p < 0.006; 24 h: 93% +/- 1% vs. 96% +/- 2%, p = 0.003; 48 h: 92% +/- 1.8% vs. 96% +/- 1%, p = 0.004).
A thoracic epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine, with or without fentanyl, provided effective pain relief in most patients with a very low degree of motor blockade. Adding 2 microg/ml fentanyl to 0.2% ropivacaine reduced total consumption of local anesthetic solution and need for incremental doses, but did not provide clinically relevant advantages in quality of pain relief and incidence of motor block, leading to a significant decrease in peripheral SpO(2), lasting up to 48 hours after surgery.
评估在麻醉后护理单元以外提供患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)时,向0.2%罗哌卡因中添加低浓度芬太尼的效果。
前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
某大学麻醉科的住院患者。
32例ASA身体状况为I、II和III级的患者,他们计划接受择期腹部大手术,包括肠切除术、肝切除术和胰十二指肠切除术。
患者接受标准的全身/硬膜外麻醉。术后患者以双盲方式随机分配,接受含0.2%罗哌卡因(n = 16)或0.2%罗哌卡因/2微克/毫升芬太尼(n = 16)的PCEA[背景输注速度为4至6毫升/小时,增量剂量为1.5毫升,锁定时间为20分钟]。手术结束后1、6、12、24和48小时,由一名盲法观察者评估咳嗽时的动态疼痛、镇静程度、脉搏血氧饱和度、血流动力学变量和运动阻滞情况。还记录不良事件的发生情况,包括恶心、呕吐、瘙痒、需要补充氧气(SpO₂<90%)和呼吸并发症,以及PCEA溶液的总消耗量和给予患者的增量剂量。
两组在疼痛缓解、运动阻滞、镇静程度、胃肠动力恢复及其他副作用方面均未观察到差异。单独接受0.2%罗哌卡因的患者比接受罗哌卡因/芬太尼混合液的患者需要更多增量剂量(23剂[0 - 60]比5剂[0 - 25])(p = 0.006),且需要更多镇痛溶液(230毫升[140 - 282]比204[130 - 228])(p = 0.003)。在输注罗哌卡因/芬太尼期间,12、24和48小时的外周血氧饱和度低于单独接受罗哌卡因的患者(12小时:91%±2%比95%±2%,p < 0.006;24小时:93%±1%比96%±2%,p = 0.003;48小时:92%±1.8%比96%±1%,p = 0.004)。
胸段硬膜外输注0.2%罗哌卡因,无论是否添加芬太尼,对大多数患者均能有效缓解疼痛,且运动阻滞程度极低。向0.2%罗哌卡因中添加2微克/毫升芬太尼可减少局部麻醉溶液的总消耗量和增量剂量需求,但在疼痛缓解质量和运动阻滞发生率方面未提供临床相关优势,导致外周SpO₂显著下降,术后可持续长达48小时。