Suppr超能文献

比较罗哌卡因联合或不联合芬太尼与布比卡因联合芬太尼用于双侧全膝关节置换术后硬膜外镇痛。

Comparison of ropivacaine with and without fentanyl vs bupivacaine with fentanyl for postoperative epidural analgesia in bilateral total knee replacement surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain, and Perioperative Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi 110060, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain, and Perioperative Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi 110060, India.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Pain after total knee replacement (TKR) interferes with early rehabilitation. Although the use of epidural bupivacaine in post-TKR patients is associated with effective analgesia, the associated motor blockade effect delays functional recovery. We compared analgesic efficacy and side effects of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with plain ropivacaine 0.1% with/without fentanyl 2.5 μg/mL vs plain bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2.5 μg/mL in patients undergoing bilateral TKR.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, randomized study.

SETTINGS

Operation room, postoperative recovery room, and intensive joint replacement unit.

PATIENTS

Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists I to II post-TKR patients who were randomly allocated to receive postoperative PCEA with plain ropivacaine 0.1% (group 1), ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 2.5 μg/mL (group 2), and plain bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2.5 μg/mL (group 3).

INTERVENTION

Postoperatively, the PCEA settings were standardized for a basal flow of 4 mL/h, demand dose of 6 mL, and lock-out interval of 20 minutes. "Rescue" analgesia included epidural boluses (6 mL) of respective study drug over and above PCEA administration.

MEASUREMENTS

Postoperative pain profile, total PCEA drug used, heart rate, and noninvasive blood pressure, side effects, and patient satisfaction were recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

Demographic parameters, duration of surgery, and hemodynamic variables (heart rate and noninvasive blood pressure) were comparable for the 3 study groups. Pain scores and rescue drug requirements were greater in "ropivacaine-only" group. Motor blockade was greatest in "bupivacaine-fentanyl" group. Postoperatively, despite the presence of minor side effects (nausea, itching) in the "ropivacaine-fentanyl" and bupivacaine-fentanyl groups, the patients belonging to these groups were more satisfied.

CONCLUSION

After bilateral TKR, ropivacaine-fentanyl combination administered through a PCEA system resulted in "superior" analgesic efficacy, that is, pain relief without motor blockade, than "ropivacaine alone" (lesser pain relief) and bupivacaine-fentanyl (pain relief but with attendant motor blockade). Overall, the addition of fentanyl to epidural local anesthetic returned favorable postoperative analgesia profile and patient satisfaction with minor incidence of opioid-related side effects.

摘要

研究目的

全膝关节置换术后(TKR)的疼痛会干扰早期康复。虽然硬膜外布比卡因在 TKR 后患者中的应用与有效镇痛相关,但相关的运动阻滞作用会延迟功能恢复。我们比较了接受双侧 TKR 的患者中术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)中布比卡因 0.0625%加芬太尼 2.5μg/ml 与布比卡因 0.1%加芬太尼 2.5μg/ml 与单纯布比卡因 0.1%的镇痛效果和副作用。

设计

前瞻性、双盲、随机研究。

地点

手术室、术后恢复室和强化关节置换病房。

患者

90 名接受 TKR 的美国麻醉医师协会 I 至 II 级患者,随机分为三组:接受术后 PCEA 中布比卡因 0.1%(第 1 组)、布比卡因 0.1%加芬太尼 2.5μg/ml(第 2 组)和布比卡因 0.0625%加芬太尼 2.5μg/ml(第 3 组)。

干预

术后,将 PCEA 设置为基础流量 4ml/h、需求剂量 6ml 和锁定间隔 20 分钟。“解救”镇痛包括硬膜外推注(6ml)各自研究药物,超过 PCEA 给药。

测量

记录术后疼痛情况、总 PCEA 药物使用、心率和无创血压、副作用和患者满意度。

主要结果

三组患者的人口统计学参数、手术时间和血流动力学变量(心率和无创血压)均无差异。“仅布比卡因”组的疼痛评分和抢救药物需求更高。“布比卡因-芬太尼”组的运动阻滞最大。术后,尽管“布比卡因-芬太尼”和布比卡因-芬太尼组有轻微副作用(恶心、瘙痒),但这些组的患者更满意。

结论

在双侧 TKR 后,通过 PCEA 系统给予布比卡因-芬太尼联合用药可实现“更好”的镇痛效果,即无运动阻滞的疼痛缓解,优于“仅布比卡因”(疼痛缓解程度较低)和布比卡因-芬太尼(疼痛缓解但伴有运动阻滞)。总的来说,在硬膜外局部麻醉中加入芬太尼可以获得有利的术后镇痛效果和患者满意度,同时伴有轻微的阿片类药物相关副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验