Accardi A, Pusch M
Istituto di Cibernetica e Biofisica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via de Marini 6, I-16149 Genova, Italy.
J Gen Physiol. 2000 Sep;116(3):433-44. doi: 10.1085/jgp.116.3.433.
Gating of the muscle chloride channel CLC-1 involves at least two processes evidenced by double-exponential current relaxations when stepping the voltage to negative values. However, there is little information about the gating of CLC-1 at positive voltages. Here, we analyzed macroscopic gating of CLC-1 over a large voltage range (from -160 to +200 mV). Activation was fast at positive voltages but could be easily followed using envelope protocols that employed a tail pulse to -140 mV after stepping the voltage to a certain test potential for increasing durations. Activation was biexponential, demonstrating the presence of two gating processes. Both time constants became exponentially faster at positive voltages. A similar voltage dependence was also seen for the fast gate time constant of CLC-0. The voltage dependence of the time constant of the fast process of CLC-1, tau(f), was steeper than that of the slow one, tau(s) (apparent activation valences were z(f) approximately -0. 79 and z(s) approximately -0.42) such that at +200 mV the two processes became kinetically distinct by almost two orders of magnitude (tau(f) approximately 16 micros, tau(s) approximately 1 ms). This voltage dependence is inconsistent with a previously published gating model for CLC-1 (Fahlke, C., A. Rosenbohm, N. Mitrovic, A.L. George, and R. Rüdel. 1996. Biophys. J. 71:695-706). The kinetic difference at 200 mV allowed us to separate the steady state open probabilities of the two processes assuming that they reflect two parallel (not necessarily independent) gates that have to be open simultaneously to allow ion conduction. Both open probabilities could be described by Boltzmann functions with gating valences around one and with nonzero "offsets" at negative voltages, indicating that the two "gates" never close completely. For comparison with single channel data and to correlate the two gating processes with the two gates of CLC-0, we characterized their voltage, pH(int), and Cl dependence, and the dominant myotonia inducing mutation, I290M. Assuming a double-barreled structure of CLC-1, our results are consistent with the identification of the fast and slow gating processes with the single-pore and the common-pore gate, respectively.
当将电压阶跃到负值时,肌肉氯离子通道CLC-1的门控涉及至少两个过程,双指数电流弛豫证明了这一点。然而,关于CLC-1在正电压下的门控信息很少。在这里,我们分析了CLC-1在较大电压范围(从-160到+200 mV)内的宏观门控。在正电压下激活很快,但使用包络协议很容易跟踪,该协议在将电压阶跃到某个测试电位并增加持续时间后,使用尾脉冲到-140 mV。激活是双指数的,表明存在两个门控过程。在正电压下,两个时间常数都呈指数级加快。CLC-0的快速门时间常数也有类似的电压依赖性。CLC-1快速过程的时间常数tau(f)的电压依赖性比慢速过程的tau(s)更陡峭(表观激活价分别为z(f)约为-0.79和z(s)约为-0.42),因此在+200 mV时,这两个过程在动力学上相差近两个数量级(tau(f)约为16微秒,tau(s)约为1毫秒)。这种电压依赖性与先前发表的CLC-1门控模型不一致(Fahlke, C., A. Rosenbohm, N. Mitrovic, A.L. George, and R. Rüdel. 1996. Biophys. J. 71:695 - 706)。200 mV时的动力学差异使我们能够分离这两个过程的稳态开放概率,假设它们反映了两个平行(不一定独立)的门,必须同时打开才能允许离子传导。两个开放概率都可以用玻尔兹曼函数描述,门控价约为1,在负电压下有非零“偏移”,表明这两个“门”从未完全关闭。为了与单通道数据进行比较,并将这两个门控过程与CLC-0的两个门相关联,我们表征了它们的电压、细胞内pH值和细胞外[Cl]依赖性,以及主要的肌强直诱导突变I290M。假设CLC-1具有双桶结构,我们的结果与分别用单孔门和共孔门识别快速和慢速门控过程一致。