Suppr超能文献

一项关于“灭虱法”与单一应用杀虫剂产品治疗头虱效果对比的试点随机对照试验的方法与操作。

The methodology and operation of a pilot randomized control trial of the effectiveness of the Bug Busting method against a single application insecticide product for head louse treatment.

作者信息

Bingham P, Kirk S, Hill N, Figueroa J

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, Isle of Wight Health Authority, Newport, Isle of Wight PO30 3ED, UK.

出版信息

Public Health. 2000 Jul;114(4):265-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900645.

Abstract

A Department of Health leaflet suggests two treatment methods for head lice: mechanical removal by wet combing; and insecticide lotion/rinses. However, there are no reports in the literature comparing the effectiveness of these two treatment methods and well controlled clinical trials of insecticide treatments are sparse. A pilot randomized control trial of the effectiveness of a specific method of wet combing, 'Bug Busting', against a single application of a proprietary insecticide product is reported. The difficulties of designing a trial are discussed and modifications that would allow a definitive trial to take place are suggested. The pilot study included enzyme analysis of lice for insecticide resistance status assessment.

摘要

卫生部的一份传单提出了两种治疗头虱的方法

湿梳法进行机械清除;以及使用杀虫剂洗液/冲洗剂。然而,文献中没有比较这两种治疗方法有效性的报告,且杀虫剂治疗的严格对照临床试验很少。本文报告了一项关于一种特定湿梳法“灭虱法”与单次使用一种专利杀虫剂产品有效性的初步随机对照试验。讨论了设计该试验的困难,并提出了能进行确定性试验的改进措施。该初步研究包括对头虱进行酶分析以评估杀虫剂抗性状况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验