Weisner C, McLellan A T, Hunkeler E M
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, 401 Parnassus, Box 0984, 94143, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Sep;19(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(99)00103-8.
The Addiction Severity Index (ASI) is a widely used interview among substance-dependent populations in treatment. Its value as a treatment planning and evaluation tool has been diminished by the lack of comparative data from nonclinical samples. The present study included four scales from the ASI collected on samples of adult subscribers to a large health maintenance organization (HMO) in northern California, as well as an adult clinical sample from the same geographic region with the same HMO insurance, thereby offering informative contrasts. Interviews (N = 9,398) of non-alcohol-dependent or abuse adults from a random sample of members of a large HMO were analyzed. We collected complete ASI data on the alcohol, drug, medical, and psychiatric composite scales and partial data on the employment scale. A sample of 327 adult members of the same HMO from one of the counties included in the survey, who were admitted to treatment for alcohol and/or drug addiction, was administered the same ASI items at treatment admission. Analyses compare problem severities in the two samples by age and gender. The general membership reported some problems in most of the ASI problem areas, although at levels of severity that were typically far below those seen in the clinical sample. General membership and clinical samples were somewhat similar in medical status and in employment. As expected, alcohol, drug, and psychiatric status were much more severe in the clinical sample. The data from the HMO general membership sample provide one potential comparison group against which to judge the severity of problems presented by drug- and alcohol-dependent patients at treatment admission and at posttreatment follow-up. The authors discuss the implications for treatment planning and the evaluation of treatment outcome.
成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)是一种在治疗中广泛应用于药物依赖人群的访谈工具。由于缺乏来自非临床样本的比较数据,其作为治疗规划和评估工具的价值有所降低。本研究纳入了从北加利福尼亚一个大型健康维护组织(HMO)的成年订阅者样本中收集的ASI的四个量表,以及来自同一地理区域、拥有相同HMO保险的成年临床样本,从而提供了有益的对比。对来自一个大型HMO随机抽取的非酒精依赖或滥用酒精的成年成员样本进行了访谈(N = 9398)。我们收集了酒精、药物、医疗和精神综合量表的完整ASI数据以及就业量表的部分数据。对来自调查所涵盖的一个县的327名同一HMO成年成员样本进行了访谈,这些成员因酒精和/或药物成瘾入院接受治疗,在入院时接受了相同的ASI项目调查。分析按年龄和性别比较了两个样本中的问题严重程度。普通会员在大多数ASI问题领域都报告了一些问题,尽管严重程度通常远低于临床样本中的情况。普通会员和临床样本在医疗状况和就业方面有些相似。正如预期的那样,临床样本中的酒精、药物和精神状况要严重得多。HMO普通会员样本的数据提供了一个潜在的比较组,可据此判断药物和酒精依赖患者在入院治疗时和治疗后随访时所呈现问题的严重程度。作者讨论了对治疗规划和治疗结果评估的影响。