Hedenstierna G, Schildt B
Ups J Med Sci. 1975;80(1):7-10. doi: 10.3109/03009737509178982.
The results of cardiac output determinations by a dye dilution technique were compared using (a) a dichromatic earpiece which was calibrated as a flow-through cuvette, but also permitted automatic computing by virtue of a pressure capsule, and (b) an ordinary flow-through densitometer. Eleven subjects, some with cardio-pulmonary disease, were investigated. Cardiac outputs were systematically overestimated when automatically computed. The results obtained by manual calculation with the ear-piece corresponded more nearly with those derived from the flow-through cuvette, but still with a deviation from the identity line and with a residual standard deviation of 0.8 l/min. Double determinations had a residual standard deviation of 0.7 l/min. Despite its ease of handling, an earpiece densitometer seems to be too unreliable to be suitable for routine use.
采用(a)一种双色听筒对通过染料稀释技术测定心输出量的结果进行了比较,该听筒被校准为流通式比色皿,并且借助压力胶囊还能进行自动计算;以及(b)一台普通的流通式密度计。对11名受试者进行了研究,其中一些患有心肺疾病。在心输出量通过自动计算时会系统性地被高估。使用听筒手动计算得到的结果与通过流通式比色皿得到的结果更为接近,但仍与恒等线存在偏差,剩余标准差为0.8升/分钟。重复测定的剩余标准差为0.7升/分钟。尽管听筒密度计操作简便,但似乎可靠性太差,不适合常规使用。