Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, Lang I, Christ G, Schemper M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H
Department of Cardiology, Vienna General Hospital, and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Austria.
N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 31;343(9):611-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008313430903.
Whether to perform valve replacement in patients with asymptomatic but severe aortic stenosis is controversial. Therefore, we studied the natural history of this condition to identify predictors of outcome.
During 1994, we identified 128 consecutive patients with asymptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (59 women and 69 men; mean [+/-SD] age, 60+/-18 years; aortic-jet velocity, 5.0+/-0.6 m per second). The patients were prospectively followed until 1998.
Follow-up information was available for 126 patients (98 percent) for a mean of 22+/-18 months. Event-free survival, with the end point defined as death (8 patients) or valve replacement necessitated by the development of symptoms (59 patients), was 67+/-5 percent at one year, 56+/-5 percent at two years, and 33+/-5 percent at four years. Five of the six deaths from cardiac disease were preceded by symptoms. According to multivariate analysis, only the extent of aortic-valve calcification was an independent predictor of outcome, whereas age, sex, and the presence or absence of coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia were not. Event-free survival for patients with no or mild valvular calcification was 92+/-5 percent at one year, 84+/-8 percent at two years, and 75+/-9 percent at four years, as compared with 60+/-6 percent, 47+/-6 percent, and 20+/-5 percent, respectively, for those with moderate or severe calcification. The rate of progression of stenosis, as reflected by the aortic-jet velocity, was significantly higher in patients who had cardiac events (0.45+/-0.38 m per second per year) than those who did not have cardiac events (0.14+/-0.18 m per second per year, P<0.001), and the rate of progression of stenosis provided useful prognostic information. Of the patients with moderately or severely calcified aortic valves whose aortic-jet velocity increased by 0.3 m per second or more within one year, 79 percent underwent surgery or died within two years of the observed increase.
In asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis, it appears to be relatively safe to delay surgery until symptoms develop. However, outcomes vary widely. The presence of moderate or severe valvular calcification, together with a rapid increase in aortic-jet velocity, identifies patients with a very poor prognosis. These patients should be considered for early valve replacement rather than have surgery delayed until symptoms develop.
对于无症状但严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者是否进行瓣膜置换存在争议。因此,我们研究了这种疾病的自然病史以确定预后的预测因素。
1994年期间,我们连续纳入了128例无症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者(59例女性和69例男性;平均[±标准差]年龄为60±18岁;主动脉瓣射流速度为5.0±0.6米/秒)。对这些患者进行前瞻性随访直至1998年。
126例患者(98%)获得了随访信息,平均随访时间为22±18个月。无事件生存率(终点定义为死亡8例或因症状出现而需要进行瓣膜置换59例)1年时为67±5%,2年时为56±5%,4年时为33±5%。6例心脏病死亡患者中有5例在死亡前出现了症状。多因素分析显示,只有主动脉瓣钙化程度是预后的独立预测因素,而年龄、性别以及是否存在冠状动脉疾病、高血压、糖尿病和高胆固醇血症则不是。无或轻度瓣膜钙化患者的无事件生存率1年时为92±5%,2年时为84±8%,4年时为75±9%,而中度或重度钙化患者分别为60±6%、47±6%和20±5%。有心脏事件患者的狭窄进展速度(以主动脉瓣射流速度反映)显著高于无心脏事件患者(分别为每年0.45±0.38米/秒和0.14±0.18米/秒,P<0.001),狭窄进展速度提供了有用的预后信息。在主动脉瓣中度或重度钙化且主动脉瓣射流速度在1年内增加0.3米/秒或更多的患者中,79%在观察到增加后的两年内接受了手术或死亡。
对于无症状的主动脉瓣狭窄患者,似乎将手术推迟至症状出现相对安全。然而,预后差异很大。中度或重度瓣膜钙化以及主动脉瓣射流速度快速增加提示患者预后极差。这些患者应考虑早期进行瓣膜置换,而不应将手术推迟至症状出现。