Kuha S, Moilanen P, Kampman R
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1975 May;51(4):249-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1975.tb11091.x.
The present study is a methodological examination in which the social and psychic background factors of 100 tuberculous patients, aged 20 to 45 years, were explored using psychiatric interview and psychological tests (MMPI, Rorschach, and Wartegg). The purpose of the study was to analyse the effect of social background factors on the psychiatric and psychological examination. With the help of correlation coefficients and three-factor factor analysis, the variable indicating the social class of the subject could be proved to correlate significantly to the projective test variables (Rorschach, Wartegg). No such correlation between the social group variable and those obtained in the psychiatric interview or the MMPI test could be demonstrated. On the basis of the projective tests, subjects in the lower social classes were considered more disturbed. It can be supposed that the background factors characteristic of lower social classes would contribute to the unfamiliar test situation, causing reactions disturbing the test performance. This suggests that the mentioned tests should be used with caution in the evaluation of personality disturbances.
本研究是一项方法学检验,其中对100名年龄在20至45岁之间的结核病患者的社会和心理背景因素进行了探索,采用了精神科访谈和心理测试(明尼苏达多相人格调查表、罗夏墨迹测验和瓦特艾格测验)。该研究的目的是分析社会背景因素对精神科和心理检查的影响。借助相关系数和三因素因子分析,可证明表明受试者社会阶层的变量与投射测验变量(罗夏墨迹测验、瓦特艾格测验)显著相关。未发现社会群体变量与在精神科访谈或明尼苏达多相人格调查表测试中获得的变量之间存在这种相关性。根据投射测验,社会阶层较低的受试者被认为干扰更大。可以推测,社会阶层较低的背景因素会导致测试情境不熟悉,从而引发干扰测试表现的反应。这表明在评估人格障碍时应谨慎使用上述测试。