• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)、米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)和罗夏墨迹测验的诊断效率:一项综述。

Comparing the diagnostic efficiency of the MMPI, MCMI-II, and Rorschach: a review.

作者信息

Ganellen R J

机构信息

Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1996 Oct;67(2):219-43. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6702_1.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6702_1
PMID:8828186
Abstract

The diagnostic efficiency of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II (MCMI-II), and Rorschach Comprehensive System for detecting depressive and psychotic disorders were compared. Studies examining the diagnostic performance of these measures published in the Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, Psychological Assessment, and the Journal of Personality Assessment were included in this review. The methodological limitations of these studies are identified and suggestions for improving future research are offered. Although only limited conclusions can be reached because of the small number of existing studies and methodological problems, several preliminary observations were made. First, the MMPI, MCMI-II, and Rorschach are comparable in their sensitivity to detecting depression. However, high MMPI and MCMI-II scores are not specific to depression and misclassify a substantial percentage of nondepressed patients as being depressed. The Rorschach has a lower rate of false positives and higher specificity than the MMPI and the MCMI-II. Second, the Rorschach was more sensitive and specific to psychotic disorders than either the MMPI or MCMI-II. The MCMI-II did not detect psychosis at a rate above chance and frequently inaccurately classified psychotic patients as nonpsychotic. Overall, these preliminary findings suggest that Rorschach indices are promising psychometric markers for depression and psychotic disorders. The clinical implications of these preliminary findings are discussed.

摘要

比较了明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)、米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)和罗夏综合系统在检测抑郁和精神障碍方面的诊断效率。本综述纳入了发表于《临床与咨询心理学杂志》《心理评估》和《人格评估杂志》上的关于这些测评工具诊断性能的研究。确定了这些研究的方法学局限性,并为改进未来研究提供了建议。尽管由于现有研究数量较少以及方法学问题只能得出有限的结论,但仍得出了一些初步观察结果。首先,MMPI、MCMI-II和罗夏测验在检测抑郁症方面的敏感性相当。然而,MMPI和MCMI-II的高分并非抑郁症所特有,将相当比例的非抑郁症患者误分类为抑郁症患者。罗夏测验的假阳性率低于MMPI和MCMI-II,特异性更高。其次,罗夏测验对精神障碍的敏感性和特异性高于MMPI或MCMI-II。MCMI-II检测精神病的准确率未高于随机概率,且经常将精神病患者错误地分类为非精神病患者。总体而言,这些初步研究结果表明,罗夏测验指标有望成为抑郁和精神障碍的心理测量学标志物。讨论了这些初步研究结果的临床意义。

相似文献

1
Comparing the diagnostic efficiency of the MMPI, MCMI-II, and Rorschach: a review.比较明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)、米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)和罗夏墨迹测验的诊断效率:一项综述。
J Pers Assess. 1996 Oct;67(2):219-43. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6702_1.
2
The diagnosis and assessment of depression, mania, and psychosis by self-report.通过自我报告对抑郁症、躁狂症和精神病进行诊断与评估。
J Pers Assess. 1993 Feb;60(1):1-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6001_1.
3
Differentiating psychotic patients from nonpsychotic patients with the MMPI-2 and Rorschach.使用明尼苏达多项人格测验第二版(MMPI - 2)和罗夏墨迹测验区分精神病患者与非精神病患者。
J Pers Assess. 2008 Jan;90(1):93-101. doi: 10.1080/00223890701693819.
4
Contributions of discriminant analysis to differential diagnosis by self-report.判别分析对自我报告鉴别诊断的贡献。
J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):320-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_12.
5
Comparative validity of MMPI-2 and MCMI-II personality disorder classifications.明尼苏达多项人格调查表-2(MMPI-2)与米隆临床多轴问卷-Ⅱ(MCMI-Ⅱ)人格障碍分类的比较效度
J Pers Assess. 1996 Jun;66(3):569-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_7.
6
Can psychosis be malingered on the Rorschach? An empirical study.罗夏墨迹测验能否伪装出精神病症状?一项实证研究。
J Pers Assess. 1996 Feb;66(1):65-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_5.
7
Estimation of MCMI DSM-III axis II constructs from MMPI scales and subscales.从明尼苏达多项人格调查表(MMPI)量表及分量表估计米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)DSM-III轴II结构。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):195-201. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674058.
8
Correspondence of the MMPI-2 and MCMI-II in male substance abusers.男性药物滥用者中明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI - 2)与米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI - II)的相关性
J Pers Assess. 1995 Apr;64(2):390-3. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_18.
9
The MMPI and the MCMI in the evaluation of narcissism in a clinical sample.在临床样本中使用明尼苏达多相人格测验(MMPI)和米隆临床多轴量表(MCMI)评估自恋
J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):239-51. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_3.
10
MMPI and Rorschach indices of schizophrenic and depressive diagnoses among adolescent inpatients.青少年住院患者中精神分裂症和抑郁症诊断的明尼苏达多相人格测验(MMPI)及罗夏墨迹测验指标
J Pers Assess. 1988 Summer;52(2):276-87. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5202_9.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a Mixed-Methods Approach to Analyze Traumatic Experiences and Factors of Vulnerability Among Adolescent Victims of Bullying.采用混合方法分析青少年欺凌受害者的创伤经历和脆弱因素。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;10:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00890. eCollection 2019.
2
A study of remitted and treatment-resistant depression using MMPI and including pessimism and optimism scales.一项使用明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)并纳入悲观和乐观量表对缓解期及难治性抑郁症的研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 3;9(10):e109137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109137. eCollection 2014.
3
Individual differences in personality profiles among potential living kidney transplant donors.
潜在活体肾移植供体个性特征的个体差异。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2013 Dec 31;44(4):213-7. eCollection 2013 Oct.