采用全厚或中厚皮片修复桡侧游离皮瓣供区。一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Repair of the radial free flap donor site with full or partial thickness skin grafts. A prospective randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Sidebottom A J, Stevens L, Moore M, Magennis P, Devine J C, Brown J S, Vaughan E D

机构信息

Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Jun;29(3):194-7.

DOI:
Abstract

The radial forearm free flap has become the mainstay in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects following ablative resection in the oral cavity. The method of repair of the associated forearm tissue defect has been the subject of considerable debate. The options range from direct closure, to local soft tissue flaps or skin graft repair. Larger defects usually require a skin graft and we have routinely used partial thickness skin. An audit of our complication rate led to the consideration of whether a full thickness repair would reduce the morbidity. We randomly allocated successive patients to receive full or partial thickness skin graft repair of the radial donor site in a consecutive series of 68 patients over an 18-month period. Sixty-four patients completed the initial assessment period of wound healing. Thirty seven patients completed a questionnaire at one year to subjectively assess the aesthetic appearance of the forearm wound and the skin graft donor site. They were also assessed for pain at both sites. The partial thickness donor site required significantly more re-dressings. There was no significant difference between the two groups in graft take or number of re-dressings at the recipient site. There was no significant difference in patient assessment of aesthetic appearance or pain in either the forearm recipient site or the skin graft donor site. Provided that an adequate graft is taken, full thickness and partial thickness skin grafts have the same short-term and long-term outcomes in the repair of the radial free flap donor site.

摘要

桡侧前臂游离皮瓣已成为口腔切除术后软组织缺损重建的主要手段。相关前臂组织缺损的修复方法一直是诸多争论的焦点。修复选项包括直接缝合、局部软组织皮瓣或皮肤移植修复。较大的缺损通常需要皮肤移植,我们常规使用的是中厚皮片。对我们的并发症发生率进行审查后,促使我们思考全厚皮片修复是否会降低发病率。在18个月期间,我们将连续的68例患者随机分配,分别接受桡侧供区的全厚或中厚皮片移植修复。64例患者完成了伤口愈合的初始评估期。37例患者在一年时填写了问卷,以主观评估前臂伤口和皮肤移植供区的美观程度。同时还对两个部位的疼痛情况进行了评估。中厚皮片供区需要更多的换药。两组在受区皮片成活情况或换药次数上没有显著差异。在前臂受区或皮肤移植供区,患者对美观程度或疼痛的评估也没有显著差异。只要获取足够的皮片,全厚和中厚皮片在桡侧游离皮瓣供区修复中的短期和长期效果相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索