Berkman L F, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman T E
Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Sep;51(6):843-57. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00065-4.
It is widely recognized that social relationships and affiliation have powerful effects on physical and mental health. When investigators write about the impact of social relationships on health, many terms are used loosely and interchangeably including social networks, social ties and social integration. The aim of this paper is to clarify these terms using a single framework. We discuss: (1) theoretical orientations from diverse disciplines which we believe are fundamental to advancing research in this area; (2) a set of definitions accompanied by major assessment tools; and (3) an overarching model which integrates multilevel phenomena. Theoretical orientations that we draw upon were developed by Durkheim whose work on social integration and suicide are seminal and John Bowlby, a psychiatrist who developed attachment theory in relation to child development and contemporary social network theorists. We present a conceptual model of how social networks impact health. We envision a cascading causal process beginning with the macro-social to psychobiological processes that are dynamically linked together to form the processes by which social integration effects health. We start by embedding social networks in a larger social and cultural context in which upstream forces are seen to condition network structure. Serious consideration of the larger macro-social context in which networks form and are sustained has been lacking in all but a small number of studies and is almost completely absent in studies of social network influences on health. We then move downstream to understand the influences network structure and function have on social and interpersonal behavior. We argue that networks operate at the behavioral level through four primary pathways: (1) provision of social support; (2) social influence; (3) on social engagement and attachment; and (4) access to resources and material goods.
人们普遍认识到社会关系和归属感对身心健康有着强大的影响。当研究人员撰写关于社会关系对健康的影响时,许多术语被宽泛地使用且相互替换,包括社会网络、社会纽带和社会融合。本文的目的是使用一个单一框架来厘清这些术语。我们将讨论:(1)来自不同学科的理论取向,我们认为这些取向对于推进该领域的研究至关重要;(2)一组定义以及主要的评估工具;(3)一个整合多层次现象的总体模型。我们借鉴的理论取向是由涂尔干(其关于社会融合和自杀的著作具有开创性)、精神病学家约翰·鲍尔比(他提出了与儿童发展相关的依恋理论)以及当代社会网络理论家所发展的。我们提出了一个社会网络如何影响健康的概念模型。我们设想了一个级联因果过程,从宏观社会层面到心理生物学过程,这些过程动态地联系在一起,形成了社会融合影响健康的过程。我们首先将社会网络置于更大的社会和文化背景中,在这个背景中,上游力量被视为塑造网络结构的条件。除了少数研究外,几乎所有研究都缺乏对网络形成和维持所处的更大宏观社会背景的认真考虑,而在社会网络对健康影响的研究中几乎完全没有涉及。然后我们转向下游,以理解网络结构和功能对社会及人际行为的影响。我们认为网络通过四条主要途径在行为层面发挥作用:(1)提供社会支持;(2)社会影响;(3)对社会参与和依恋的影响;(4)获取资源和物质商品。