Chamberlain Brent, Novack Valerie, Larsen Teresa, Park Keunhyun, Johnson Samuel, Sheen Jefferson, Abrishami Motahareh, Licon Carlos, Christensen Keith
Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Department of Sociology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Jul 31;6:1624771. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1624771. eCollection 2025.
An individual's participation in community life is important to their health, well-being, self-determination, and quality of life. Consequently, community planners and policymakers play a role in shaping and improving environments through land use planning, including the distribution of amenities. This research explores the influence of different amenities, referred to as place types, and their influence on social satisfaction during and before the COVID-19 pandemic. A nationwide online survey of 393 adults across the U.S.A. was conducted to compare participants who self-report as living with and without a disability (41% and 59%, respectively). To uncover the relationship between place types and social satisfaction, participants responded to questions about social relationships, social satisfaction, frequency of visitation to place types, and the perceived importance of place types. Results indicate that the frequency of visits and perceived importance of place types were significantly associated with social satisfaction ( = 0.30, = 0.001). Disability status, income level, population density, and employment status significantly predicted reduced visitation frequency during the pandemic ( < 0.001). comparisons revealed that individuals with disabilities experience a lower level of satisfaction with social life living closer to outdoor recreation ( = 0.006) and healthcare facilities ( = 0.025) compared to other place types. The findings emphasize the need for planners to better account for accessibility and inclusion in the design and combination of community amenities.
个人参与社区生活对其健康、幸福、自主决定权和生活质量至关重要。因此,社区规划者和政策制定者通过土地利用规划,包括设施的分布,在塑造和改善环境方面发挥着作用。本研究探讨了不同设施(称为场所类型)的影响及其在新冠疫情期间和之前对社会满意度的影响。在美国对393名成年人进行了一项全国性在线调查,以比较自我报告有残疾和无残疾的参与者(分别为41%和59%)。为了揭示场所类型与社会满意度之间的关系,参与者回答了有关社会关系、社会满意度、对场所类型的访问频率以及场所类型的感知重要性的问题。结果表明,访问频率和场所类型的感知重要性与社会满意度显著相关(=0.30,=0.001)。残疾状况、收入水平、人口密度和就业状况显著预测了疫情期间访问频率的降低(<0.001)。比较显示,与其他场所类型相比残疾人对靠近户外娱乐设施(=0.006)和医疗设施(=0.025)的社会生活满意度较低。研究结果强调规划者需要在社区设施的设计和组合中更好地考虑可达性和包容性。