Rowland J H, Desmond K A, Meyerowitz B E, Belin T R, Wyatt G E, Ganz P A
Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Sep 6;92(17):1422-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.17.1422.
Tissue-sparing approaches to primary treatment and reconstructive options provide improved cosmetic outcomes for women with breast cancer. Earlier research has suggested that conservation or restitution of the breast might mitigate the negative effects of breast cancer on women's sexual well-being. Few studies, however, have compared psychosocial outcomes of women who underwent lumpectomy, mastectomy alone, or mastectomy with reconstruction. To address some of these issues, we examined women's adaptation to surgery in two large cohorts of breast cancer survivors.
A total of 1957 breast cancer survivors (1-5 years after diagnosis) from two major metropolitan areas were assessed in two waves with the use of a self-report questionnaire that included a number of standardized measures of health-related quality of life, body image, and physical and sexual functioning. All P: values are two-sided.
More than one half (57%) of the women underwent lumpectomy, 26% had mastectomy alone, and 17% had mastectomy with reconstruction. As in earlier studies, women in the mastectomy with reconstruction group were younger than those in the lumpectomy or mastectomy-alone groups (mean ages = 50.3, 55.9, and 58.9, respectively; P: =.0001); they were also more likely to have a partner and to be college educated, affluent, and white. Women in both mastectomy groups complained of more physical symptoms related to their surgeries than women in the lumpectomy group. However, the groups did not differ in emotional, social, or role function. Of interest, women in the mastectomy with reconstruction group were most likely to report that breast cancer had had a negative impact on their sex lives (45.4% versus 29.8% for lumpectomy and 41.3% for mastectomy alone; P: =. 0001).
The psychosocial impact of type of primary surgery for breast cancer occurs largely in areas of body image and feelings of attractiveness, with women receiving lumpectomy experiencing the most positive outcome. Beyond the first year after diagnosis, a woman's quality of life is more likely influenced by her age or exposure to adjuvant therapy than by her breast surgery.
乳腺癌女性的保乳治疗及重建手术方案可改善美容效果。早期研究表明,保留或恢复乳房可能减轻乳腺癌对女性性健康的负面影响。然而,很少有研究比较接受保乳手术、单纯乳房切除术或乳房切除术后重建手术的女性的心理社会结局。为解决其中一些问题,我们在两个大型乳腺癌幸存者队列中研究了女性对手术的适应情况。
来自两个主要大都市地区的1957名乳腺癌幸存者(诊断后1至5年)分两波接受评估,使用一份自我报告问卷,其中包括一些与健康相关的生活质量、身体形象以及生理和性功能的标准化测量指标。所有P值均为双侧。
超过一半(57%)的女性接受了保乳手术,26%进行了单纯乳房切除术,17%进行了乳房切除术后重建手术。与早期研究一样,乳房切除术后重建组的女性比保乳手术组或单纯乳房切除术组的女性更年轻(平均年龄分别为50.3岁、55.9岁和58.9岁;P = 0.0001);她们也更有可能有伴侣、受过大学教育、富裕且为白人。两个乳房切除术组的女性比保乳手术组的女性抱怨更多与手术相关的身体症状。然而,三组在情感、社交或角色功能方面没有差异。有趣的是,乳房切除术后重建组的女性最有可能报告乳腺癌对她们的性生活有负面影响(45.4%,保乳手术组为29.8%,单纯乳房切除术组为41.3%;P = 0.0001)。
乳腺癌初次手术类型的心理社会影响主要体现在身体形象和吸引力感受方面,接受保乳手术的女性结局最为积极。在诊断后的第一年之后,女性的生活质量更可能受其年龄或辅助治疗的影响,而非乳房手术。