• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)时代接受治疗的1127例前列腺癌男性患者的外照射放疗剂量反应特征

External beam radiotherapy dose response characteristics of 1127 men with prostate cancer treated in the PSA era.

作者信息

Pollack A, Smith L G, von Eschenbach A C

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Sep 1;48(2):507-12. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00620-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00620-9
PMID:10974469
Abstract

PURPOSE

To characterize the relationship of radiotherapy dose to prostate cancer patient outcome, with an emphasis on the influence of pretreatment prognostic variables.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The 1127 Stage T1-T4 prostate cancer patients examined were treated consecutively with definitive external beam radiotherapy at the University of Texas-M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1987 to 1997. All had a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive PSA elevations on follow-up. There were 994 patients treated with a four-field box throughout to 60-70 Gy after a small reduction at 46 Gy and 161 treated with a six-field conformal boost after 46 Gy to 74-78 Gy. No patient received neoadjuvant or adjuvant androgen ablation. Median follow-up was 51.8 months.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into three radiotherapy dose groups consisting of </=67 Gy (n = 500), >67-77 Gy (n = 495), and >77 Gy (n = 132). Relative to other prognostic factors, there were fewer patients treated to the highest dose level with a pretreatment PSA (PSAB) </=4 or >20 ng/ml, Stage T3/T4 disease, or a Gleason score of 2-6. Actuarial 4-year freedom from biochemical failure (bNED) rates for the entire cohort were 54%, 71%, and 77% (p < 0.0001) for the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose groups. PSAB, palpable stage, and Gleason score were also highly significant. In Cox proportional hazards regression, dose (p < 0. 0001 as a continuous or categorical variable) was an independent predictor of bNED, as were the other prognostic factors. Pairwise univariate comparisons showed that an increase in dose from </=67 Gy to >67-77 Gy was associated with improved bNED rates for all PSAB (</=10 and >10), stage (T1/T2 and T3/T4), and Gleason score (2-6 and 7-10) subgroups tested. In contrast, the only prognostic group that benefited from raising dose from >67-77 Gy to >77 Gy was patients with a PSAB >10 ng/ml; although trends were noted for Stage T1/T2 and Gleason 2-6 patients. Patients with the combined features of a PSAB >10 ng/ml and Stage T1/T2 disease had 4-year bNED rates of 61% and 93% at the intermediate- and high-dose levels. A strongly significant linear association between dose (60-78 Gy) and 4-year actuarial bNED was demonstrated for patients with these intermediate-risk features.

CONCLUSION

Prostate cancer dose response to external beam radiotherapy should be considered in the context of pretreatment prognostic factors. Our data indicate that, for favorable patients with a PSAB of </=10 ng/ml, intermediate doses of >67-77 Gy provide the same rate of control as higher doses. However, longer follow-up may reveal a benefit to dose escalation >77 Gy, even in this favorable subset. Substantial and clinically relevant enhancements in bNED were seen at all dose levels for moderate-risk patients, such as those having a PSAB >10 ng/ml and Stage T1/T2 disease. Sustained bNED was not realized for high-risk patients, even using 78 Gy; these patients may be best treated with higher doses, whole pelvic irradiation, and/or androgen ablation plus radiation.

摘要

目的

描述放射治疗剂量与前列腺癌患者预后的关系,重点关注治疗前预后变量的影响。

方法与材料

1987年至1997年在德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心对1127例T1 - T4期前列腺癌患者进行了根治性外照射放疗。所有患者治疗前均有前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平。治疗失败定义为随访期间PSA连续两次升高。994例患者全程采用四野盒式照射,在46 Gy时稍减量后给予60 - 70 Gy,161例患者在46 Gy后采用六野适形加量照射至74 - 78 Gy。无患者接受新辅助或辅助雄激素剥夺治疗。中位随访时间为51.8个月。

结果

患者分为三个放射治疗剂量组,分别为≤67 Gy(n = 500)、>67 - 77 Gy(n = 495)和>77 Gy(n = 132)。相对于其他预后因素,接受最高剂量水平治疗的患者中,治疗前PSA(PSAB)≤4或>20 ng/ml、T3/T4期疾病或Gleason评分为2 - 6的患者较少。整个队列的4年无生化失败(bNED)精算率,低剂量组、中剂量组和高剂量组分别为54%、71%和77%(p < 0.0001)。PSAB、可触及分期和Gleason评分也具有高度显著性。在Cox比例风险回归中,剂量(作为连续或分类变量,p < 0.0001)是bNED的独立预测因素,其他预后因素也是如此。单因素两两比较显示,对于所有测试的PSAB(≤10和>10)、分期(T1/T2和T3/T4)和Gleason评分(2 - 6和7 - 10)亚组,剂量从≤67 Gy增加到>67 - 77 Gy与bNED率提高相关。相比之下,唯一从剂量从>67 - 77 Gy提高到>77 Gy中获益的预后组是PSAB>10 ng/ml的患者;尽管T1/T2期和Gleason 2 - 6分的患者有此趋势。具有PSAB>10 ng/ml和T1/T2期疾病联合特征的患者,中剂量和高剂量水平的4年bNED率分别为61%和93%。对于具有这些中危特征的患者,剂量(60 - 78 Gy)与4年精算bNED之间存在显著的线性关联。

结论

应在治疗前预后因素的背景下考虑前列腺癌对外照射放疗的剂量反应。我们的数据表明,对于PSAB≤10 ng/ml的预后良好患者,67 - 77 Gy的中等剂量提供的控制率与更高剂量相同。然而,更长时间的随访可能会发现,即使在这个预后良好的亚组中,剂量增加到>77 Gy也有益处。对于中危患者,如PSAB>10 ng/ml和T1/T2期疾病的患者,在所有剂量水平下bNED都有显著且临床相关的提高。高危患者即使使用78 Gy也未实现持续的bNED;这些患者可能最好采用更高剂量、全盆腔照射和/或雄激素剥夺加放疗进行治疗。

相似文献

1
External beam radiotherapy dose response characteristics of 1127 men with prostate cancer treated in the PSA era.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)时代接受治疗的1127例前列腺癌男性患者的外照射放疗剂量反应特征
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Sep 1;48(2):507-12. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00620-9.
2
External beam radiotherapy dose response of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的外照射放疗剂量反应
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Dec 1;39(5):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00508-7.
3
Perineural invasion and Gleason 7-10 tumors predict increased failure in prostate cancer patients with pretreatment PSA <10 ng/ml treated with conformal external beam radiation therapy.神经周围侵犯和Gleason评分7 - 10级肿瘤预示着接受适形外照射放疗的前列腺癌患者(治疗前前列腺特异性抗原<10 ng/ml)失败风险增加。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jul 15;41(5):1087-92. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00167-9.
4
Dose response in prostate cancer with 8-12 years' follow-up.对前列腺癌进行8至12年随访后的剂量反应。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Oct 1;54(2):427-35. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02954-1.
5
Association of percent positive prostate biopsies and perineural invasion with biochemical outcome after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.局部前列腺癌外照射放疗后前列腺活检阳性百分比及神经周围浸润与生化结果的相关性
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Sep 1;60(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.031.
6
Results of 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.三维适形放疗治疗局限性前列腺癌的结果
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 May 1;38(2):311-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)82499-6.
7
Outcome and predictive factors for patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma treated with three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy.三维适形外照射放疗治疗 Gleason 评分 7 前列腺癌患者的结局及预测因素
Cancer. 2000 Dec 15;89(12):2565-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001215)89:12<2565::aid-cncr8>3.0.co;2-i.
8
Defining the appropriate radiation dose for pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL prostate cancer.确定前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)≤10 ng/mL的前列腺癌患者预处理的合适辐射剂量。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jun 1;47(3):649-54. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00465-x.
9
Early stage prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy: stratifying an intermediate risk group.早期前列腺癌的放射治疗:对中危组进行分层
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Jun 1;38(3):569-73. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00100-4.
10
Relationship between prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen nadir, and biochemical control.前列腺体积、前列腺特异性抗原最低点与生化控制之间的关系。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Mar 15;52(4):888-92. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02764-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Value of 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in predicting response to radical radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer.18F-氟胆碱PET/CT在预测局限性前列腺癌患者根治性放疗反应中的价值。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jul 27;30:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.07.002. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Optimizing External Beam Radiotherapy as per the Risk Group of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Multi-Institutional Study (KROG 18-15).根据局限性前列腺癌风险组优化外照射放疗:一项全国性多机构研究(KROG 18-15)
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 31;13(11):2732. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112732.
3
Low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy: long-term results from a single institution team experience.
中危前列腺癌患者接受放射治疗时低剂量率/高剂量率近距离放疗增敏:单机构团队经验的长期结果
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2021 Apr;13(2):135-144. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105280. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
4
Dose Escalation for Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Long-Term Update on the Outcomes of a Phase 3, Single Institution Randomized Clinical Trial.前列腺腺癌的剂量递增:一项 3 期单机构随机临床试验结果的长期更新。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):790-797. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.045. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
5
Localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy: Long-term outcomes at a European comprehensive cancer centre.采用外照射放疗治疗的局限性前列腺癌:欧洲一家综合癌症中心的长期疗效
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016 May-Jun;21(3):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
6
Comparison of dose volume histograms for supine and prone position in patients irradiated for prostate cancer-A preliminary study.前列腺癌放疗患者仰卧位和俯卧位剂量体积直方图的比较——一项初步研究。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2011 Feb 1;16(2):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2011.01.003. eCollection 2011.
7
The case for hypofractionation of localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌大分割放疗的理由。
Rev Urol. 2013;15(3):113-7.
8
Clinical outcome of patients treated with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer on RTOG 9406.RTOG 9406 研究中接受 3D 适形放疗(3D-CRT)治疗的前列腺癌患者的临床结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 1;83(3):e363-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.070.
9
The feasibility and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with low-dose external beam radiotherapy as supplemental therapy for advanced prostate cancer following hormonal therapy.高强度聚焦超声联合低剂量外照射放疗作为激素治疗后晚期前列腺癌补充治疗的可行性和安全性。
Asian J Androl. 2011 May;13(3):499-504. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.153. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
10
A new method for synthesizing radiation dose-response data from multiple trials applied to prostate cancer.一种综合来自多个试验的辐射剂量-反应数据的新方法,应用于前列腺癌。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 15;77(4):1066-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Oct 31.