Wong William W, Schild Steven E, Vora Sujay A, Halyard Michele Y
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, 13400 E. Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Sep 1;60(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.031.
Few studies have evaluated the significance of the percentage of positive biopsies (PPB) and perineural invasion (PNI) for patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. Our goal was to investigate the value of these factors in predicting biochemical control (bNED) after EBRT.
The study cohort consisted of 331 patients who received EBRT between 1993 and 1999 for clinically localized prostate cancer. The median follow-up was 4.4 years (range, 3 months to 9.6 years). The distribution by clinical T stage was as follows: T1 in 55 (17%), T2a in 94 (28%), T2b in 76 (23%), T2c in 74 (22%), T3a in 27 (8%), and T3b in 5 (2%). The pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) level was < or =10 ng/mL in 224 patients, 10.1-20 ng/mL in 72 patients, and >20 ng/mL in 35 patients. The biopsy Gleason score was < or =6 in 216 patients and > or =7 in 115 patients. On the basis of the pathology report, the PPB was calculated for 239 patients and was < or =33% in 109, 34-66% in 72, and > or =67% in 58 patients. PNI was present in 30 patients. The median dose of EBRT was 68.4 Gy (range, 64-71 Gy). Patients were categorized into three risk groups: 142 patients were low risk (T1-T2, iPSA < or =10 ng/mL, and Gleason score < or =6), 137 were intermediate risk (increase in the value of one of the risk factors); and 52 patients were high risk (increase in value of two or more of the risk factors). Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive rises in the PSA level.
The 5-year bNED rate for the entire cohort was 62%. The 5-year bNED rate for the low-, intermediate, and high-risk group was 79%, 51%, and 47%, respectively (p <0.0001). On univariate analysis (log-rank test), clinical stage (p = 0.0073), grade (p <0.0001), iPSA (p = 0.0043), risk group (p <0.0001), PPB (p = 0.0193), and presence of PNI (p = 0.0137) correlated with bNED. For T1-T2a, T2b-T2c, and T3 patients, the 5-year bNED rate was 71%, 59%, and 40%, respectively. The 5-year bNED rate was 68% for those with an iPSA level of < or =10 ng/mL and 49% for those with an iPSA level of >10 ng/mL. For patients with PPB < or =33%, 34-66%, and > or =67%, the 5-year bNED rate was 75%, 67%, and 51%, respectively. Within the intermediate-risk group, the PPB was significantly associated with the bNED rate: 67%, 52%, and 30% for those with PPB < or =33%, 34-66%, and > or =67%, respectively (p = 0.0046). This association was not seen in the low- or high-risk group. The 5-year bNED rate was 64% for patients without PNI and 48% for those with PNI. On multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards model), the statistically significant predictive factors for bNED were risk group (p = 0.0032) and PPB (p = 0.044). Using the chi-square test, statistically significant associations between T stage, PSA level, Gleason score, and risk group with PPB were found; PNI was significantly associated with T stage and PSA level only.
Our results showed that PPB and PNI have a statistically significant impact on the bNED rate in patients treated with conventional dose of EBRT (< or =71 Gy). Within the intermediate-risk group, the PPB was predictive of bNED, suggesting that patients with < or =33% PPB had a statistically significant better treatment outcome compared with those with a greater PPB. PNI was not significant for bNED in multivariate analysis. The effects of these two prognostic factors in patients who have been treated with higher doses of RT (> or =75.6 Gy) should be studied.
很少有研究评估局部前列腺癌患者接受外照射放疗(EBRT)时活检阳性百分比(PPB)和神经周围浸润(PNI)的意义。我们的目标是研究这些因素在预测EBRT后生化控制(bNED)方面的价值。
研究队列包括1993年至1999年间因临床局限性前列腺癌接受EBRT的331例患者。中位随访时间为4.4年(范围3个月至9.6年)。临床T分期分布如下:T1期55例(17%),T2a期94例(28%),T2b期76例(23%),T2c期74例(22%),T3a期27例(8%),T3b期5例(2%)。224例患者治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(iPSA)水平≤10 ng/mL,72例患者为10.1 - 20 ng/mL,35例患者>20 ng/mL。216例患者活检Gleason评分≤6分,115例患者≥7分。根据病理报告,计算了239例患者的PPB,109例患者PPB≤33%,72例患者为34 - 66%,58例患者≥67%。30例患者存在PNI。EBRT的中位剂量为68.4 Gy(范围64 - 71 Gy)。患者分为三个风险组:142例低风险患者(T1 - T2,iPSA≤10 ng/mL,Gleason评分≤6),137例中风险患者(一个风险因素值增加);52例高风险患者(两个或更多风险因素值增加)。生化失败定义为PSA水平连续三次升高。
整个队列的5年bNED率为62%。低、中、高风险组的5年bNED率分别为79%、51%和47%(p<0.0001)。单因素分析(对数秩检验)显示,临床分期(p = 0.0073)、分级(p<0.0001)、iPSA(p = 0.0043)、风险组(p<0.0001)、PPB(p = 0.0193)和PNI的存在(p = 0.0137)与bNED相关。对于T1 - T2a、T2b - T2c和T3期患者,5年bNED率分别为71%、59%和40%。iPSA水平≤10 ng/mL的患者5年bNED率为68%,>10 ng/mL的患者为49%。PPB≤33%、34 - 66%和≥67%的患者,5年bNED率分别为75%、67%和51%。在中风险组中,PPB与bNED率显著相关:PPB≤33%、34 - 66%和≥67%的患者分别为67%、52%和30%(p = 0.0046)。在低风险组或高风险组中未观察到这种关联。无PNI患者的5年bNED率为64%,有PNI患者为48%。多因素分析(Cox比例风险模型)显示,bNED的统计学显著预测因素为风险组(p = 0.0032)和PPB(p = 0.044)。使用卡方检验发现,T分期、PSA水平、Gleason评分和风险组与PPB之间存在统计学显著关联;PNI仅与T分期和PSA水平显著相关。
我们的结果表明,PPB和PNI对接受常规剂量EBRT(≤71 Gy)治疗的患者的bNED率有统计学显著影响。在中风险组中,PPB可预测bNED,表明PPB≤33%的患者与PPB更高的患者相比,治疗结果在统计学上有显著更好的表现。多因素分析中PNI对bNED无显著意义。应研究这两个预后因素在接受更高剂量放疗(≥75.6 Gy)患者中的作用。