Cooper G M, Jones J J, Arbique J C, Flowerdew G J, Forward K R
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center and the Departments of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;37(4):231-5. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00156-5.
The majority of microbiology laboratories have implemented quality improvement procedures such as a Q scoring system to assess the nature of clinical specimens. Our study reviewed the sources and the amount of variation when Q scoring of lower respiratory secretions was performed. In total, 450 slides representing lower respiratory tract secretions were Q scored by three experienced technologists. Total agreement regarding the number of neutrophils, squamous epithelial cells and Q scores was 76%, 57% and 57% respectively. The major factor influencing Q score values was the enumeration of epithelial cells. From our findings, we expect that there is greater variability in Q scoring then is generally acknowledged and there is a substantial degree of subjectivity on part of individual technologists reading gram stains.
大多数微生物实验室已实施质量改进程序,如采用Q评分系统来评估临床标本的性质。我们的研究回顾了对下呼吸道分泌物进行Q评分时的来源及变异量。共有450张代表下呼吸道分泌物的玻片由三名经验丰富的技术人员进行Q评分。在中性粒细胞、鳞状上皮细胞数量及Q评分方面,总体一致性分别为76%、57%和57%。影响Q评分值的主要因素是上皮细胞的计数。根据我们的研究结果,我们预计Q评分的变异性比普遍认为的更大,而且在解读革兰染色时,个别技术人员存在相当程度的主观性。