Suppr超能文献

技术人员在呼吸道标本质量评估中的内部和相互之间的变异性。

Intra and inter technologist variability in the quality assessment of respiratory tract specimens.

作者信息

Cooper G M, Jones J J, Arbique J C, Flowerdew G J, Forward K R

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center and the Departments of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;37(4):231-5. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00156-5.

Abstract

The majority of microbiology laboratories have implemented quality improvement procedures such as a Q scoring system to assess the nature of clinical specimens. Our study reviewed the sources and the amount of variation when Q scoring of lower respiratory secretions was performed. In total, 450 slides representing lower respiratory tract secretions were Q scored by three experienced technologists. Total agreement regarding the number of neutrophils, squamous epithelial cells and Q scores was 76%, 57% and 57% respectively. The major factor influencing Q score values was the enumeration of epithelial cells. From our findings, we expect that there is greater variability in Q scoring then is generally acknowledged and there is a substantial degree of subjectivity on part of individual technologists reading gram stains.

摘要

大多数微生物实验室已实施质量改进程序,如采用Q评分系统来评估临床标本的性质。我们的研究回顾了对下呼吸道分泌物进行Q评分时的来源及变异量。共有450张代表下呼吸道分泌物的玻片由三名经验丰富的技术人员进行Q评分。在中性粒细胞、鳞状上皮细胞数量及Q评分方面,总体一致性分别为76%、57%和57%。影响Q评分值的主要因素是上皮细胞的计数。根据我们的研究结果,我们预计Q评分的变异性比普遍认为的更大,而且在解读革兰染色时,个别技术人员存在相当程度的主观性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验