Chisholm D, Sekar K, Kumar K K, Saeed K, James S, Mubbashar M, Murthy R S
Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London.
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;176:581-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.176.6.581.
Targeting resources on cost-effective care strategies is important for the global mental health burden.
To demonstrate cost-outcome methods in the evaluation of mental health care programmes in low-income countries.
Four rural populations were screened for psychiatric morbidity. Individuals with a diagnosed common mental disorder were invited to seek treatment, and assessed prospectively on symptoms, disability, quality of life and resource use.
Between 12% and 39% of the four screened populations had a diagnosable common mental disorder. In three of the four localities there were improvements over time in symptoms, disability and quality of life, while total economic costs were reduced.
Economic analysis of mental health care in low-income countries is feasible and practicable. Our assessment of the cost-effectiveness of integrating mental health into primary care was confounded by the naturalistic study design and the low proportion of subjects using government primary health care services.
将资源用于具有成本效益的护理策略对全球精神卫生负担至关重要。
展示在低收入国家评估精神卫生保健项目中的成本效益方法。
对四个农村人口进行精神疾病发病率筛查。邀请被诊断患有常见精神障碍的个体寻求治疗,并对症状、残疾、生活质量和资源使用情况进行前瞻性评估。
在四个被筛查人群中,12%至39%患有可诊断的常见精神障碍。在四个地区中的三个,随着时间推移,症状、残疾和生活质量有所改善,同时总经济成本降低。
低收入国家精神卫生保健的经济分析是可行且切实可行的。我们对将精神卫生纳入初级保健的成本效益评估因自然主义研究设计以及使用政府初级卫生保健服务的受试者比例较低而受到混淆。