Clark D I, Downing N, Mitchell J, Coulson L, Syzpryt E P, Doherty M
Department of Orthopaedics, City Hospital Nottingham, UK.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Sep;59(9):700-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.9.700.
To determine the efficacy of the individual components of physiotherapy in subjects with anterior knee pain.
An observer blind, prospective, factorial design randomised controlled trial. 81 young adults with anterior knee pain were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups: (1) exercise, taping, and education; (2) exercise and education; (3) taping and education; and (4) education alone. Each group received six physiotherapist-led treatments over three months. Follow up took place at three months using the following outcome measures: patient satisfaction (discharge/refer for further treatment); a visual analogue pain score; the WOMAC lower limb function score; the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD); and quadriceps strength. At 12 months the WOMAC and HAD were assessed by postal questionnaire.
All groups showed significant improvements in WOMAC, visual analogue, and HAD scores; these improvements did not vary significantly between the four groups or between exercising/non-exercising and taped/non-taped patients at three and 12 months. However, patients who exercised were significantly more likely to be discharged at three months than non-exercising patients (chi(2), p<0.001). Taping was not significantly associated with discharge. Significantly greater improvements in WOMAC, visual analogue, and the anxiety score (but not the depression score) were seen in patients who were discharged than in those who were referred.
The proprioceptive muscle stretching and strengthening aspects of physiotherapy have a beneficial effect at three months sufficient to permit discharge from physiotherapy. These benefits are maintained at one year. Taping does not influence the outcome.
确定物理治疗的各个组成部分对膝关节前侧疼痛患者的疗效。
一项观察者盲法、前瞻性、析因设计的随机对照试验。81名膝关节前侧疼痛的年轻成年人被随机分配到四个治疗组之一:(1)运动、贴扎和教育;(2)运动和教育;(3)贴扎和教育;(4)仅接受教育。每组在三个月内接受六次由物理治疗师主导的治疗。在三个月时进行随访,使用以下结局指标:患者满意度(出院/转诊进一步治疗);视觉模拟疼痛评分;WOMAC下肢功能评分;医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD);以及股四头肌力量。在12个月时,通过邮寄问卷对WOMAC和HAD进行评估。
所有组在WOMAC、视觉模拟评分和HAD评分方面均有显著改善;在三个月和十二个月时,这四项指标在四组之间或运动/不运动以及贴扎/不贴扎患者之间的改善没有显著差异。然而,在三个月时,运动的患者比不运动的患者出院的可能性显著更高(卡方检验,p<0.001)。贴扎与出院没有显著关联。出院的患者在WOMAC、视觉模拟评分和焦虑评分(但不包括抑郁评分)方面的改善明显大于转诊的患者。
物理治疗中本体感觉肌肉拉伸和强化方面在三个月时具有有益效果,足以允许患者从物理治疗中出院。这些益处可持续一年。贴扎不影响治疗结果。