• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估与管理累积效应:流程与制约因素

Evaluating and Managing Cumulative Effects: Process and Constraints.

作者信息

MacDonald LH

机构信息

Department of Earth Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1482, USA

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2000 Sep;26(3):299-315. doi: 10.1007/s002670010088.

DOI:10.1007/s002670010088
PMID:10977883
Abstract

/ Cumulative effects (CEs) result from the combined effect of multiple activities over space or time. This implies a persistence through time and often a transmittal mechanism through space. Environmental legislation often requires a broader CE assessment in addition to the more direct, project-specific impacts. Current efforts to evaluate and manage CEs are hampered by the conceptual problems of defining the key issues, specifying the appropriate spatial and temporal scales, and determining the numerous interactions and indirect effects. These problems can be greatly alleviated by following an explicit process. The process proposed in this paper includes a scoping phase, an analysis phase, and a planning and management phase, with each phase consisting of two to five discrete but interrelated tasks. Numerous approaches have been developed to assess CEs, and these range from simple checklists to complex, physically based models. The utility of each approach depends on the resource of concern, relative risk to those resources, information available, and time frame for the evaluation. In nearly all cases the assessment and regulation of CEs is severely hampered by the variability in site conditions and management effects, inability to predict secondary or indirect effects, lack of data on recovery rates, difficulty of validating predictive models, and uncertainty of future events.Since any proposed activity could contribute to a wide range of potential CEs at different spatial and temporal scales, a tiered or nested approach should be followed to assess CEs. The difficulty of assessing and predicting CEs also suggests that in many cases the most efficient approach is to focus on minimizing on-site impacts. Under some circumstances adaptive management can also be a viable alternative to detailed CE assessments. Regular monitoring and feedback is critical to the successful management and regulation of CEs.

摘要

累积效应(CEs)源于多种活动在空间或时间上的综合影响。这意味着随着时间推移具有持续性,且通常存在一种空间传递机制。除了更直接的、特定项目的影响外,环境立法往往还要求进行更广泛的累积效应评估。目前评估和管理累积效应的工作因在定义关键问题、确定适当的时空尺度以及确定众多相互作用和间接影响等概念性问题而受阻。遵循一个明确的流程可大大缓解这些问题。本文提出的流程包括一个范围界定阶段、一个分析阶段以及一个规划和管理阶段,每个阶段由两到五个离散但相互关联的任务组成。已经开发出多种评估累积效应的方法,从简单的清单到复杂的基于物理的模型不等。每种方法的效用取决于所关注的资源、这些资源面临的相对风险、可用信息以及评估的时间框架。在几乎所有情况下,累积效应的评估和监管都因场地条件和管理效果的变异性、无法预测次生或间接影响、缺乏恢复率数据、难以验证预测模型以及未来事件的不确定性而受到严重阻碍。由于任何拟议的活动都可能在不同的时空尺度上导致广泛的潜在累积效应,因此应采用分层或嵌套方法来评估累积效应。评估和预测累积效应的难度还表明,在许多情况下,最有效的方法是专注于尽量减少现场影响。在某些情况下,适应性管理也可以是详细累积效应评估的可行替代方案。定期监测和反馈对于累积效应的成功管理和监管至关重要。

相似文献

1
Evaluating and Managing Cumulative Effects: Process and Constraints.评估与管理累积效应:流程与制约因素
Environ Manage. 2000 Sep;26(3):299-315. doi: 10.1007/s002670010088.
2
Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.美国东部地区遥感气溶胶光学厚度与PM2.5之间关系的评估及统计建模
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 May(167):5-83; discussion 85-91.
3
The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.拥堵收费计划对伦敦空气质量的影响。第1部分。排放建模与空气污染测量分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Apr(155):5-71.
4
Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.地表水和地下水中污染物的来源、途径及相对风险:为沃克顿调查准备的一份报告
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2002 Jan 11;65(1):1-142. doi: 10.1080/152873902753338572.
5
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
6
A review of potential methods of determining critical effect size for designing environmental monitoring programs.用于设计环境监测项目的确定临界效应大小的潜在方法综述。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 Jul;28(7):1361-71. doi: 10.1897/08-376.1. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
7
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
8
Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.用于评估基因组损伤的下一代检测策略:一个概念框架及考量因素
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017 Jun;58(5):264-283. doi: 10.1002/em.22045. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
9
Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.第2部分。开发增强的统计方法,以评估与多种空气污染物的未知数量主要来源相关的健康影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015 Jun(183 Pt 1-2):51-113.
10
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pragmatic Approach for Developing Landbase Cumulative Effects Assessments with Aggregated Impacts Crossing Multiple Ecological Values.具有跨多个生态值聚合影响的土地基数累积效应评估的务实方法。
Environ Manage. 2022 May;69(5):1020-1034. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01632-9. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
2
An example of DNA methylation as a means to quantify stress in wildlife using killer whales.利用虎鲸研究野生动物压力的 DNA 甲基化定量方法示例。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 19;11(1):16822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96255-1.
3
Culturally modified trees or wasted timber: Different approaches to marked trees in Poland's Białowieża Forest.
文化修饰过的树木还是浪费的木材:波兰比亚沃维耶扎森林中标记树木的不同方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0211025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211025. eCollection 2019.
4
Perspectives on Driving Changes in Project-based Cumulative Effects Assessment for Biodiversity: Lessons from the Canadian Experience.基于项目的生物多样性累积影响评估变革的观点:来自加拿大经验的教训。
Environ Manage. 2018 Nov;62(5):929-941. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1086-6. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
Group elicitations yield more consistent, yet more uncertain experts in understanding risks to ecosystem services in New Zealand bays.小组启发法在理解新西兰海湾生态系统服务风险方面产生了更一致但也更不确定的专家意见。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 2;12(8):e0182233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182233. eCollection 2017.
6
Strategic Environmental Assessment Framework for Landscape-Based, Temporal Analysis of Wetland Change in Urban Environments.城市环境中基于景观的湿地变化时间分析的战略环境评估框架
Environ Manage. 2016 Mar;57(3):696-710. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0640-8. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
7
Quantifying process-based mitigation strategies in historical context: separating multiple cumulative effects on river meander migration.在历史背景下量化基于过程的缓解策略:区分对河曲迁移的多种累积影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 25;9(6):e99736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099736. eCollection 2014.
8
Capacity for watershed cumulative effects assessment and management: lessons from the Lower Fraser River Basin, Canada.流域累积效应评估和管理能力:来自加拿大弗雷泽河流域的经验教训。
Environ Manage. 2013 Aug;52(2):360-73. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0075-z. Epub 2013 May 24.