Abraham S C, Nobukawa B, Giardiello F M, Hamilton S R, Wu T T
Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205-2196, USA.
Am J Pathol. 2000 Sep;157(3):747-54. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64588-9.
Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) are the most common gastric polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). FGPs have traditionally been regarded as nonneoplastic, possibly hamartomatous lesions, but the pathogenesis of FGPs in both FAP and sporadic patients remains unclear. FGPs in FAP can show foveolar dysplasia, and rarely invasive gastric adenocarcinoma has been reported in patients with FAP and fundic gland polyposis. Using direct gene sequencing and allelic loss assays at 5q, we analyzed somatic adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene alterations in 41 FAP-associated FGPs (20 with foveolar dysplasia, six indefinite for dysplasia, and 15 nondysplastic) and 13 sporadic FGPs. The foveolar epithelium and dilated fundic glands of the polyps were separately microdissected and analyzed in 25 of 41 FAP-associated FGPs and 13 of 13 sporadic FGPs. Somatic APC gene alterations were identified frequently (21 of 41 cases, 51%) in FAP-associated FGPs. Both the foveolar epithelium and the dilated fundic gland epithelium comprising the FGPs were shown to carry the same somatic APC gene alteration in 24 (96%) of 25 cases. Furthermore, there was no difference in the frequency of somatic APC gene alterations between FGPs with foveolar dysplasia (10 of 20, 50%), indefinite for dysplasia (four of six, 67%), and nondysplastic (seven of 15, 47%) in FAP patients (P: = 0.697). In contrast, FGPs from non-FAP patients showed infrequent (one of 13, 8%) APC gene alterations (P: = 0.008). These results show that FGPs in FAP patients are pathogenetically distinct from sporadic FGPs. Somatic, second-hit APC gene alterations, which precede morphological dysplasia in many FAP-associated FGPs, indicate that FGPs arising in the setting of FAP are neoplastic lesions.
胃底腺息肉(FGP)是家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)患者中最常见的胃息肉。传统上,FGP被认为是非肿瘤性的,可能是错构瘤性病变,但FAP患者和散发性患者中FGP的发病机制仍不清楚。FAP中的FGP可表现为胃小凹发育异常,并且在FAP和胃底腺息肉病患者中很少有侵袭性胃腺癌的报道。我们使用直接基因测序和5q等位基因缺失分析,分析了41例FAP相关FGP(20例有胃小凹发育异常,6例发育异常不明确,15例无发育异常)和13例散发性FGP中的体细胞腺瘤性息肉病(APC)基因改变。在41例FAP相关FGP中的25例以及13例散发性FGP中的13例中,分别对息肉的胃小凹上皮和扩张的胃底腺进行了显微切割和分析。在FAP相关FGP中,体细胞APC基因改变频繁出现(41例中的21例,51%)。在25例中的24例(96%)中,构成FGP的胃小凹上皮和扩张的胃底腺上皮均显示携带相同的体细胞APC基因改变。此外,FAP患者中,有胃小凹发育异常的FGP(20例中的10例,50%)、发育异常不明确的FGP(6例中的4例,67%)和无发育异常的FGP(15例中的7例,47%)的体细胞APC基因改变频率没有差异(P = 0.697)。相比之下,非FAP患者的FGP显示APC基因改变很少见(13例中的1例,8%)(P = 0.008)。这些结果表明,FAP患者中的FGP在发病机制上与散发性FGP不同。在许多FAP相关FGP中,形态学发育异常之前出现的体细胞第二次打击APC基因改变表明,FAP背景下出现的心FGP是肿瘤性病变。