Suppr超能文献

项目反应理论与21世纪的健康结果测量

Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.

作者信息

Hays R D, Morales L S, Reise S P

机构信息

UCLA, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2000 Sep;38(9 Suppl):II28-42. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00007.

Abstract

Item response theory (IRT) has a number of potential advantages over classical test theory in assessing self-reported health outcomes. IRT models yield invariant item and latent trait estimates (within a linear transformation), standard errors conditional on trait level, and trait estimates anchored to item content. IRT also facilitates evaluation of differential item functioning, inclusion of items with different response formats in the same scale, and assessment of person fit and is ideally suited for implementing computer adaptive testing. Finally, IRT methods can be helpful in developing better health outcome measures and in assessing change over time. These issues are reviewed, along with a discussion of some of the methodological and practical challenges in applying IRT methods.

摘要

在评估自我报告的健康结果方面,项目反应理论(IRT)相对于经典测试理论具有许多潜在优势。IRT模型产生不变的项目和潜在特质估计值(在线性变换范围内)、基于特质水平的标准误差以及锚定到项目内容的特质估计值。IRT还便于评估项目功能差异、在同一量表中纳入具有不同反应格式的项目、评估个体拟合度,并且非常适合实施计算机自适应测试。最后,IRT方法有助于开发更好的健康结果测量方法以及评估随时间的变化。本文回顾了这些问题,并讨论了应用IRT方法时的一些方法学和实际挑战。

相似文献

1
Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.
Med Care. 2000 Sep;38(9 Suppl):II28-42. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00007.
2
Item response theory and its applications to patient-reported outcomes measurement.
Eval Health Prof. 2005 Sep;28(3):264-82. doi: 10.1177/0163278705278275.
3
Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis.
Med Care. 2000 Sep;38(9 Suppl):II60-5. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00009.
5
Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: the challenges for health outcomes assessment.
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:187-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9197-1. Epub 2007 Apr 7.
6
IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary.
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:121-32. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9177-5. Epub 2007 Mar 10.
7
Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000246649.43232.82.
8
Item response theory: applications of modern test theory in medical education.
Med Educ. 2003 Aug;37(8):739-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01587.x.
9
Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function.
J Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;41(1):153-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130813. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

2
Connecting Contemporary Paradigms to the Social Security Administration's Disability Evaluation Process.
J Disabil Policy Stud. 2011 Sep;22(2):116-128. doi: 10.1177/1044207310396509. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
3
Assessing Social Participation Among Kidney Transplant Recipients Using PROMIS Computer Adaptive Testing.
Kidney Int Rep. 2025 May 19;10(8):2708-2719. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.05.023. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Racial Disparities in Quality of Dental Care Among Publicly Insured Children.
Med Care. 2025 Jul 7;63(9):646-55. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002184.
5
New horizons: Evolving approaches to uncertainty tolerance scale development.
Med Educ. 2025 Aug;59(8):787-791. doi: 10.1111/medu.15732. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
6
A psychometric study of the Flourishing Scale for people living with dementia.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 24;11(2):e70097. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70097. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
8
IRT analysis of the BDI-II for early online depression detection: validation in a Mexican population.
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 15;16:1562016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1562016. eCollection 2025.
10
A perspective on the use of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measures in ambulatory healthcare.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Apr;25(4):441-449. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2451749. Epub 2025 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Goodness of Fit in Item Response Models.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1995 Jan 1;30(1):23-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_2.
2
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
3
A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.
Psychometrika. 1945;10:255-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02288892.
4
Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population.
Med Care. 2000 Oct;38(10):1022-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200010000-00006.
6
Quality of life measures in epilepsy: how well can they detect change over time?
Neurology. 2000 May 9;54(9):1822-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.9.1822.
7
Evaluating the equivalence of health care ratings by whites and Hispanics.
Med Care. 2000 May;38(5):517-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200005000-00008.
10
Member ratings of health care provided by 48 physician groups.
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Apr 13;158(7):785-90. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.7.785.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验