Hays R D, Morales L S, Reise S P
UCLA, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Med Care. 2000 Sep;38(9 Suppl):II28-42. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00007.
Item response theory (IRT) has a number of potential advantages over classical test theory in assessing self-reported health outcomes. IRT models yield invariant item and latent trait estimates (within a linear transformation), standard errors conditional on trait level, and trait estimates anchored to item content. IRT also facilitates evaluation of differential item functioning, inclusion of items with different response formats in the same scale, and assessment of person fit and is ideally suited for implementing computer adaptive testing. Finally, IRT methods can be helpful in developing better health outcome measures and in assessing change over time. These issues are reviewed, along with a discussion of some of the methodological and practical challenges in applying IRT methods.
在评估自我报告的健康结果方面,项目反应理论(IRT)相对于经典测试理论具有许多潜在优势。IRT模型产生不变的项目和潜在特质估计值(在线性变换范围内)、基于特质水平的标准误差以及锚定到项目内容的特质估计值。IRT还便于评估项目功能差异、在同一量表中纳入具有不同反应格式的项目、评估个体拟合度,并且非常适合实施计算机自适应测试。最后,IRT方法有助于开发更好的健康结果测量方法以及评估随时间的变化。本文回顾了这些问题,并讨论了应用IRT方法时的一些方法学和实际挑战。