Brandt Diane E, Houtenville Andrew J, Huynh Minh T, Chan Leighton, Rasch Elizabeth K
National Institutes of Health Clinical Research Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
J Disabil Policy Stud. 2011 Sep;22(2):116-128. doi: 10.1177/1044207310396509. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
From 1998 to 2008, the Social Security Administration's (SSA) disability insurance program (DI) applications rose from 1.2 million to 2.3 million and exceeded 3 million in 2009. Given these large and growing numbers, even small changes in processing disability applications may reduce processing time, lower program costs, and improve performance of SSA's disability programs. A literature review examining current conceptual models of disability and SSA's disability evaluation process for adults was conducted. A gap exists between contemporary models of disability and how SSA defines and operationalizes disability. This is complicated by substantial variation in the timing, quantity, and quality of applicant functional information and workplace demands. A focus on impairment marginalizes more comprehensive assessment of function necessary to assess capacity for work. Novel assessment methodologies, such as computer adaptive testing to measure human functioning may hold promise for SSA's data collection methods and disability assessment.
从1998年到2008年,社会保障管理局(SSA)的伤残保险计划(DI)申请量从120万增至230万,并在2009年超过了300万。鉴于申请数量如此庞大且不断增加,即使在处理伤残申请方面做出微小改变,也可能缩短处理时间、降低项目成本并改善SSA伤残计划的绩效。我们对当前的伤残概念模型以及SSA针对成年人的伤残评估流程进行了文献综述。当代伤残模型与SSA对伤残的定义及实施方式之间存在差距。申请人功能信息的时间、数量和质量以及工作场所要求存在很大差异,这使得情况变得复杂。关注损伤会使对评估工作能力所需功能进行更全面评估的工作边缘化。诸如采用计算机自适应测试来测量人类功能等新型评估方法,可能会为SSA的数据收集方法和伤残评估带来希望。