Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Malavolta N
Divisione di Medicina Interna, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(6):518-23. doi: 10.1007/s001980070095.
The ability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) to estimate the risk of osteoporotic fractures was evaluated in a prospective study over a mean time of 5.47 years in 254 postmenopausal women (mean age 58.06+/-7.67 years). Baseline measurements of ultrasound transmission velocity (UTV) and bone mineral density (BMD) were taken at the distal radius (DR). UTV was also measured at the patella (P). Fifty nonspine fractures due to minor trauma were detected during annual check-ups with an incidence of 3.59/year. Fractures occurred in older women with a lower BMD and QUS. Using Cox regression analysis the relative risk (RR) per 1 standard deviation (SD) decrease in the unadjusted QUS and BMD measurements was: BMD-DR = 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-8.09; 95% CI 2.08-9.68. The relationship between BMD and QUS variables and fracture risk persisted after adjusting for potential confounders apart from previous fractures, giving the following RR: BMD-DR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.06-8.41; UTV-DR = 3.69, 95% CI 1.18-11.49; UTV-P = 3.89, 95% CI 1.53-9.90. Correcting also for previous fractures, only UTV-P remained an effective predictor of fracture risk even after QUS measurement correction for BMD. Wrist fractures were best related to BMD-DR (RR 7.33, 95% CI 1.43-37.50) and UTV-DR (RR 10.94, 95% CI 1.10-108.45), while hip and ankle fractures were significantly associated only with UTV-P (hip: RR 32.14, 95% CI 1.83-562.80; ankle: RR 17.60, 95% CI 1.78-173.79). The combined use of BMD and QUS is a better predictor of fracture risk than either technique used separately. Comparison of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves did not show differences in the ability of BMD and QUS to correctly distinguish fractures. In conclusion, QUS predicts fracture risk in osteoporotic women at least as well as BMD. UTV-DR and BMD-DR are good predictors of wrist fractures, while UTV-P is strongly related to hip and ankle fractures. QUS and BMD combined improve the diagnostic ability of each technique individually.
在一项针对254名绝经后女性(平均年龄58.06±7.67岁)的前瞻性研究中,对定量超声(QUS)评估骨质疏松性骨折风险的能力进行了评估,平均随访时间为5.47年。在桡骨远端(DR)进行了超声传播速度(UTV)和骨密度(BMD)的基线测量。还在髌骨(P)处测量了UTV。在年度检查中检测到50例因轻微创伤导致的非脊柱骨折,年发病率为3.59/年。骨折发生在BMD和QUS较低的老年女性中。使用Cox回归分析,未经调整的QUS和BMD测量值每降低1个标准差(SD)的相对风险(RR)为:BMD-DR = 3.56,95%置信区间(CI)1.57 - 8.09;95% CI 2.08 - 9.68。在调整了除既往骨折外的潜在混杂因素后,BMD和QUS变量与骨折风险之间的关系依然存在,得出以下RR值:BMD-DR = 2.99,95% CI 1.06 - 8.41;UTV-DR = 3.69,95% CI 1.18 - 11.49;UTV-P = 3.89,95% CI 1.53 - 9.90。即使对既往骨折进行了校正,并且对BMD进行了QUS测量校正后,只有UTV-P仍然是骨折风险的有效预测指标。腕部骨折与BMD-DR(RR 7.33,95% CI 1.43 - 37.50)和UTV-DR(RR 10.94,95% CI 1.10 - 108.45)的相关性最好,而髋部和踝部骨折仅与UTV-P显著相关(髋部:RR 32.14,95% CI 1.83 - 562.80;踝部:RR 17.60,95% CI 1.78 - 173.79)。与单独使用任何一种技术相比,联合使用BMD和QUS能更好地预测骨折风险。比较受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积,未显示出BMD和QUS正确区分骨折能力的差异。总之,QUS预测骨质疏松女性骨折风险的能力至少与BMD相当。UTV-DR和BMD-DR是腕部骨折的良好预测指标,而UTV-P与髋部和踝部骨折密切相关。QUS和BMD联合使用可提高每种技术各自的诊断能力。