• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对管理式医疗的评估在不同市场内部以及不同市场之间是如何变化的。

How consumer assessments of managed care vary within and among markets.

作者信息

Zaslavsky A M, Landon B E, Beaulieu N D, Cleary P D

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2000 Summer;37(2):146-61.

PMID:10985109
Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which the Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS) distinguishes performance of Medicare managed care (MMC) health plans. Results indicate that CAHPS ratings and report composites distinguish among plans both nationally and within markets. Global ratings of a health plan and reports on customer services varied strongly at the individual plan level, with smaller effects seen at regional and Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) levels. Ratings of doctors and health care, and reports on experiences in the doctor's office varied more among regions and among MSAs than among plans within the same MSA. These patterns are consonant with our hypotheses about the determinants of these ratings: customer service is a distinct plan function, but medical services are provided by networks that often overlap for plans in the same area. We conclude that the CAHPS-MMC survey can inform consumers choosing among plans as well as policymakers and researchers.

摘要

本研究调查了医疗保险计划消费者评估调查(CAHPS)在区分医疗保险管理式医疗(MMC)健康计划绩效方面的程度。结果表明,CAHPS评分和报告综合指标在全国范围内以及市场内部都能区分不同的计划。健康计划的总体评分和客户服务报告在单个计划层面差异很大,而在区域和大都市统计区(MSA)层面的影响较小。医生和医疗保健的评分以及医生办公室的体验报告在不同地区和不同MSA之间的差异大于同一MSA内不同计划之间的差异。这些模式与我们关于这些评分决定因素的假设一致:客户服务是一项独特的计划功能,但医疗服务是由同一地区计划中经常重叠的网络提供的。我们得出结论,CAHPS-MMC调查可以为选择计划的消费者以及政策制定者和研究人员提供信息。

相似文献

1
How consumer assessments of managed care vary within and among markets.消费者对管理式医疗的评估在不同市场内部以及不同市场之间是如何变化的。
Inquiry. 2000 Summer;37(2):146-61.
2
The effects of disseminating performance data to health plans: results of qualitative research with the Medicare Managed Care plans.向健康计划传播绩效数据的影响:对医疗保险管理式医疗计划的定性研究结果
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):643-63.
3
Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS) results for Oklahoma managed care Medicaid, 1997, 1998, and 1999.1997年、1998年和1999年俄克拉荷马州管理式医疗医疗补助计划的消费者健康计划评估调查(CAHPS)结果
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2000 Mar;93(3):109-17.
4
Do consumer reports of health plan quality affect health plan selection?消费者对健康计划质量的报告是否会影响健康计划的选择?
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):933-47.
5
Optimal design features for surveying low-income populations.针对低收入人群调查的优化设计特点。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005 Nov;16(4):677-90. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2005.0096.
6
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.传统医疗保险与管理式医疗保险绩效比较。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
7
Using existing population-based data sets to measure the American Academy of Pediatrics definition of medical home for all children and children with special health care needs.利用现有的基于人群的数据集,衡量美国儿科学会对所有儿童及有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的医疗之家定义。
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5 Suppl):1529-37.
8
Insights into problems obtaining care believed necessary as measured by the Medicaid Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS).通过医疗补助健康计划消费者评估调查(CAHPS)衡量,对获得被认为必要的医疗服务时遇到的问题的洞察。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Dec;9(12):797-803.
9
Dimensions of plan performance for sick and healthy members on the Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Study 2.0 survey.《消费者健康计划评估研究2.0》调查中患病和健康成员的计划绩效维度。
Med Care. 2002 Oct;40(10):951-64. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200210000-00012.
10
Dimensions of consumer-assessed quality of Medicare managed-care health plans.医疗保险管理式医疗健康计划的消费者评估质量维度。
Med Care. 2000 Feb;38(2):162-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200002000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicare Managed Care CAHPS: A Tool for Performance Improvement.医疗保险管理式医疗CAHPS:绩效改进工具
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):101-107.
2
Are comparisons of patient experiences across hospitals fair? A study in Veterans Health Administration hospitals.医院间患者体验的比较是否公平?一项退伍军人健康管理局医院的研究。
Med Care. 2014 Jul;52(7):619-25. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000144.
3
Market variations in intensity of Medicare service use and beneficiary experiences with care.医疗保险服务使用强度和受益人的护理体验在市场中的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):647-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01108.x. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
4
Does competition improve health care quality?竞争能提高医疗保健质量吗?
Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec;43(6):1931-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00899.x. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
5
Language and regional differences in evaluations of Medicare managed care by Hispanics.西班牙裔对医疗保险管理式医疗评估中的语言和地区差异。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr;43(2):552-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00796.x.
6
Measuring patients' experiences with individual primary care physicians. Results of a statewide demonstration project.衡量患者对个体初级保健医生的就医体验。一项全州范围示范项目的结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00311.x.
7
Plan, geographical, and temporal variation of consumer assessments of ambulatory health care.门诊医疗消费者评估的计划、地理和时间差异。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Oct;39(5):1467-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00299.x.
8
Combining health plan performance indicators into simpler composite measures.将健康计划绩效指标整合为更简单的综合指标。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):101-15.
9
Variation in patient-reported quality among health care organizations.医疗保健机构中患者报告的质量差异。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):85-100.
10
Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public.关于医疗保健质量的公开披露信息:美国公众的反应。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Jun;10(2):96-103. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.2.96.