Suppr超能文献

门诊医疗消费者评估的计划、地理和时间差异。

Plan, geographical, and temporal variation of consumer assessments of ambulatory health care.

作者信息

Zaslavsky Alan M, Zaborski Lawrence B, Cleary Paul D

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115-5899, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2004 Oct;39(5):1467-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00299.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify contributions of health plans and geography to variation in consumer assessments of health plan quality.

DATA SOURCES

Responses of beneficiaries of Medicare managed care plans to the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS(R)) survey. Our data included more than 700,000 survey responses assessing 381 Medicare managed care (MMC) contracts over a period of five years.

STUDY DESIGN

The survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of beneficiaries of Medicare managed care plans.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Member assessments of their health plans, customer service functions, and prescription drug benefits varied most across health plans; these also varied the most over time. Assessments of direct interactions with doctors and their practices were more affected by geographical location, and these assessments were quite stable over time. A health plan's global rating often changed significantly between consecutive years, but only rarely were there such changes in ratings of care or doctor. Nationally, mean assessments tended to decrease over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ratings of plans and reports about customer service and prescription access are affected by plan policies, benefits design, and administrative structures that can be changed relatively quickly. Conversely, assessments of other aspects of care are largely determined by characteristics of provider networks that are relatively stable. A consumer survey is unlikely to detect meaningful changes in quality of care from year to year unless quality improvement measures are developed that have substantially larger effects, possibly through area-wide initiatives, than historical temporal variations in quality.

摘要

目的

量化健康计划和地理位置对消费者健康计划质量评估差异的影响。

数据来源

医疗保险管理式医疗计划受益人的《健康计划消费者评估研究》(CAHPS(R))调查回复。我们的数据包括在五年期间对381份医疗保险管理式医疗(MMC)合同的70多万份调查回复。

研究设计

该调查针对医疗保险管理式医疗计划受益人的全国代表性样本进行。

主要发现

成员对其健康计划、客户服务功能和处方药福利的评估在不同健康计划之间差异最大;这些评估随时间变化也最大。与医生及其诊疗的直接互动评估受地理位置影响更大,且这些评估随时间相当稳定。健康计划的总体评级在连续两年间经常有显著变化,但护理或医生评级很少出现这种变化。在全国范围内,平均评估在研究期间趋于下降。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,计划评级以及关于客户服务和处方获取的报告受计划政策、福利设计和行政结构的影响,这些方面可以相对快速地改变。相反,护理其他方面的评估很大程度上由相对稳定的提供者网络特征决定。除非制定出比质量的历史时间变化有更大影响的质量改进措施,可能通过全区域举措,否则消费者调查不太可能逐年检测到护理质量的有意义变化。

相似文献

1
Plan, geographical, and temporal variation of consumer assessments of ambulatory health care.
Health Serv Res. 2004 Oct;39(5):1467-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00299.x.
2
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
6
Dimensions of consumer-assessed quality of Medicare managed-care health plans.
Med Care. 2000 Feb;38(2):162-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200002000-00006.
8
Health plan characteristics and consumers' assessments of quality.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):274-86. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.274.

引用本文的文献

1
2022 Reinhardt lecture: The patient's voice as signal.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec;57(6):1209-1213. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14078. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
Using Consistently Low Performance to Identify Low-Quality Physician Groups.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117954. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17954.
3
Role of practices and Clinical Commissioning Groups in measures of patient experience: analysis of routine data.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Feb;30(2):173-175. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011701. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
4
Public Hospitals in China: Is There a Variation in Patient Experience with Inpatient Care.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 11;16(2):193. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020193.
6
Variation in quality of primary-care services in Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Rwanda, Senegal, Uganda and the United Republic of Tanzania.
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Jun 1;95(6):408-418. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.175869. Epub 2017 May 9.
7
Implications of Variation in the Relationships between Beneficiary Characteristics and Medicare Advantage CAHPS Measures.
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1310-1329. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12544. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5):522-54. doi: 10.1177/1077558714541480. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
10
Better Quality of Care or Healthier Patients? Hospital Utilization by Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Enrollees.
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2013 May 15;16(1):137-161. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2012-0037.

本文引用的文献

1
Adjusting Performance Measures to Ensure Equitable Plan Comparisons.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):109-126.
2
Medicare Managed Care CAHPS: A Tool for Performance Improvement.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):101-107.
3
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey.
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1509-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00190.x.
4
The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):288-98. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-4-200302180-00007.
5
The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):273-87. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-4-200302180-00006.
6
Variation in patient-reported quality among health care organizations.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):85-100.
8
Factors affecting response rates to the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study survey.
Med Care. 2002 Jun;40(6):485-99. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200206000-00006.
9
Health plan characteristics and consumers' assessments of quality.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):274-86. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.274.
10
Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Feb;27(2):63-80. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27007-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验