• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背景知识在快速感知分类中的作用。

The role of background knowledge in speeded perceptual categorization.

作者信息

Palmeri T J, Blalock C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, 301 Wilson Hall, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2000 Nov 16;77(2):B45-57. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00100-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00100-1
PMID:10986367
Abstract

We examined the time-course of the influence of background knowledge on perceptual categorization by manipulating the meaningfulness of labels associated with categories and by manipulating the amount of time provided to subjects for making a categorization decision. Extending a paradigm originally reported by Wisniewski and Medin (1994) (Cog. Sci. 18 (1994) 221), subjects learned two categories of children's drawings that were given either meaningless labels (drawings by children from 'group 1' or 'group 2') or meaningful labels (drawings by 'creative' or 'non-creative' children); the meaningfulness of the label had a significant effect on how new drawings were classified. In addition, half of the subjects were provided unlimited time to respond, while the other half of the subjects were forced to respond quickly; speeded response conditions had a relatively large effect on categorization decisions by subjects given the meaningless labels but had relatively little effect on categorization decisions by subjects given the meaningful labels. These results suggest that some forms of background knowledge can show an influence at relatively early stages in the time-course of a categorization decision.

摘要

我们通过操纵与类别相关的标签的意义以及操纵提供给受试者做出分类决定的时间量,研究了背景知识对感知分类影响的时间进程。扩展了Wisniewski和Medin(1994年)最初报道的范式(《认知科学》18(1994年)221),受试者学习了两类儿童绘画,这些绘画被赋予了无意义的标签(来自“第一组”或“第二组”儿童的绘画)或有意义的标签(“有创造力的”或“无创造力的”儿童的绘画);标签的意义对新绘画的分类方式有显著影响。此外,一半的受试者被给予无限时间做出反应,而另一半受试者则被迫快速做出反应;快速反应条件对被赋予无意义标签的受试者的分类决定有相对较大的影响,但对被赋予有意义标签的受试者的分类决定影响相对较小。这些结果表明,某些形式的背景知识可以在分类决定的时间进程中相对较早的阶段显示出影响。

相似文献

1
The role of background knowledge in speeded perceptual categorization.背景知识在快速感知分类中的作用。
Cognition. 2000 Nov 16;77(2):B45-57. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00100-1.
2
Perceptual and categorical decision making: goal-relevant representation of two domains at different levels of abstraction.知觉与分类决策:不同抽象层次上两个领域的目标相关表征。
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jun 1;117(6):2088-2103. doi: 10.1152/jn.00512.2016. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
Category label effects on Chinese children's inductive inferences: modulation by perceptual detail and category specificity.类别标签对中国儿童归纳推理的影响:知觉细节和类别特异性的调节。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Feb;111(2):230-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
4
The effect of training methodology on knowledge representation in categorization.训练方法对分类中知识表征的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 28;12(8):e0183904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183904. eCollection 2017.
5
Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli.多维刺激感知与分类中的决策规则
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Jan;14(1):33-53. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.1.33.
6
Instance-based categorization: automatic versus intentional forms of retrieval.
Mem Cognit. 1995 Mar;23(2):227-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03197224.
7
The influence of labels and facts on children's and adults' categorization.标签和事实对儿童及成人分类的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Apr;144:130-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
8
Domain differences in the weights of perceptual and conceptual information in children's categorization.儿童分类中知觉和概念信息权重的领域差异。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Dec;49(12):2383-95. doi: 10.1037/a0032049. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
9
Instantiated features and the use of "rules.".实例化特征与“规则”的使用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):133-51. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.133.
10
The differing roles of comparison and contrast in children's categorization.比较和对比在儿童分类中的不同作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Nov;107(3):291-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.05.013. Epub 2010 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Is better beautiful or is beautiful better? Exploring the relationship between beauty and category structure.美更好还是更好的美?探索美与范畴结构的关系。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):566-73. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0356-1.
2
Psychological essentialist reasoning and perspective taking during reading: a donkey is not a zebra, but a plate can be a clock.阅读过程中的心理本质主义推理和观点采择:驴不是斑马,但盘子可以是时钟。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Feb;40(2):297-310. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0153-5.
3
How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: an eyetracking study.
先前知识如何影响类别学习中的选择性注意:一项眼动研究。
Mem Cognit. 2011 May;39(4):649-65. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0050-3.
4
See what I mean? An ERP study of the effect of background knowledge on novel object processing.明白我的意思了吧?一项关于背景知识对新异物体加工影响的事件相关电位研究。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Apr;37(3):277-91. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.3.277.
5
Category labels versus feature labels: category labels polarize inferential predictions.类别标签与特征标签:类别标签使推理预测两极分化。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Apr;36(3):544-53. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.3.544.
6
Feature-feature causal relations and statistical co-occurrences in object concepts.对象概念中的特征-特征因果关系和统计共现
Mem Cognit. 2007 Apr;35(3):418-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03193282.
7
The science of cycology: failures to understand how everyday objects work.自行车学:对日常物品工作原理的理解不足。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1667-75. doi: 10.3758/bf03195929.
8
Theory-based categorization under speeded conditions.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1102-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03193256.
9
A knowledge-resonance (KRES) model of category learning.一种类别学习的知识共振(KRES)模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):759-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03196543.
10
Putting together prior knowledge, verbal arguments, and observations in category learning.在类别学习中整合先验知识、言语论证和观察结果。
Mem Cognit. 2001 Sep;29(6):828-37. doi: 10.3758/bf03196412.