Veal D A, Deere D, Ferrari B, Piper J, Attfield P V
Centre for Development of Fluorimetric Applications in Biotechnology, Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Immunol Methods. 2000 Sep 21;243(1-2):191-210. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(00)00234-9.
Large numbers of microbiological samples are analysed annually using traditional culture-based techniques. These techniques take hours to days to yield a result, are tedious and are not suitable for non-culturable microorganisms. Further, culture-based techniques do not provide real-time information on the physiological status of the organism in situ which is important in the industrial manufacture of many microbial products. Flow cytometry offers the prospect of real-time microbial analysis of individual microorganisms, without dependency on microbial culture. However, flow cytometry has not been extensively used as a tool for routine microbial analysis. This has been mainly due to the high cost and complexity of instrumentation, the need for trained flow cytometrists and the lack of assay kits with appropriate biological reagents for specific applications. Many modern instruments are now relatively simple to operate, due to improvements in the user-interface, and no longer need a specialist operator. However, most cytometers are still reliant on analogue technology first developed 20-30 years ago. The incorporation of modern, solid state opto-electronics combined with micro-fabrication and digital signal processing technology offers the prospect of simple to use, low cost and robust instruments suitable for microbial analyses. Advances are being made in the development of a range of biological reagents and these are now being formulated into simple to use kits for microbiological applications. Currently, these kits are largely restricted to simple analyses, for example to assay for total or viable numbers of microorganisms present. However, technologies are available to selectively label specific types of microorganisms. For example, fluorescent antibodies can be used to label microorganisms according to expression of particular antigens, fluorescent in situ hybridisation to label according to phylogeny and fluorogenic enzymatic substrates to label according to expression of specific enzyme activities. Reagents are also available that stain viruses sufficiently brightly to enable their direct detection in environments such as sea water. Microorganisms need to be detected in a variety of different matrices (e.g., water, mud, food, and beverages) and these matrices may be highly variable in nature (e.g., tap water compared to river water). Many matrices have high background autofluorescence (e.g., algae and minerals in water samples) or may bind non-specifically to the fluorescent biological reagents used (e.g., protein micelles in milk). Formulation of biological reagents and sample pre-treatments are critical to the development of suitable microbiological assays. Here, developments in instrumentation and biological reagents for microbiological applications are reviewed with specific examples from environmental or industrial microbiology. The broader considerations for the development of microbial assays for flow cytometry are also considered.
每年都会使用传统的基于培养的技术分析大量微生物样本。这些技术需要数小时到数天才能得出结果,操作繁琐,且不适用于不可培养的微生物。此外,基于培养的技术无法提供有关原位生物体生理状态的实时信息,而这在许多微生物产品的工业生产中很重要。流式细胞术为单个微生物的实时微生物分析提供了前景,无需依赖微生物培养。然而,流式细胞术尚未广泛用作常规微生物分析工具。这主要是由于仪器成本高且复杂,需要训练有素的流式细胞仪操作人员,以及缺乏适用于特定应用的带有适当生物试剂的检测试剂盒。由于用户界面的改进,现在许多现代仪器操作相对简单,不再需要专业操作人员。然而,大多数细胞仪仍依赖于20 - 30年前首次开发的模拟技术。结合现代固态光电子学、微制造和数字信号处理技术,有望开发出适用于微生物分析的简单易用、低成本且坚固耐用的仪器。一系列生物试剂的开发正在取得进展,现在这些试剂正被配制成适用于微生物学应用的简单易用的试剂盒。目前,这些试剂盒主要限于简单分析,例如检测存在的微生物总数或活菌数。然而,有技术可用于选择性标记特定类型的微生物。例如,荧光抗体可根据特定抗原的表达来标记微生物,荧光原位杂交可根据系统发育来标记,荧光酶底物可根据特定酶活性的表达来标记。也有试剂可将病毒染色得足够明亮,以便在海水等环境中直接检测到它们。需要在各种不同的基质(如水、泥浆、食品和饮料)中检测微生物,而这些基质的性质可能差异很大(例如,自来水与河水相比)。许多基质具有高背景自发荧光(例如,水样中的藻类和矿物质),或者可能与所用的荧光生物试剂非特异性结合(例如,牛奶中的蛋白质胶束)。生物试剂的配方和样品预处理对于开发合适的微生物检测方法至关重要。在此,结合环境或工业微生物学的具体实例,综述了用于微生物学应用的仪器和生物试剂的进展。还考虑了流式细胞术微生物检测方法开发的更广泛因素。