Parratt Kirsten, Newton David, Dunkers Joy, Dootz Jennifer, Hunter Monique, Logan-Jackson Alshae', Pierce Laura, Sarkar Sumona, Servetas Stephanie L, Lin Nancy J
Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, United States.
Statistical Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Aug 18;16:1631377. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1631377. eCollection 2025.
Total and viable microbial cell counts are increasingly important for applications including live biotherapeutic products, food safety, and probiotics. In microbiology, cells are quantified using methods such as colony forming unit (CFU), flow cytometry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), but different methods measure different aspects of the cells (measurands), and results may not be directly comparable across methods. In the absence of a ground-truth reference material for cell count, one cannot quantify the accuracy of any cell counting method, which limits method performance assessments and comparisons. Herein, a modified analysis of cell counting methods based on the ISO 20391-2:2019 standard was developed and demonstrated for microbial cell samples diluted over a log-scale range of concentrations. samples ranging in concentration from ~5 x 10 cells/mL to 2 x 10 cells/mL were quantified using CFU, Coulter principle, fluorescence flow cytometry, and impedance flow cytometry. Quality metrics modified from the ISO standard were calculated for each method and shown to be repeatable across replicate experiments. The quality metrics illustrate large differences in proportionality and variability across methods, with total cell counts in good agreement and viable cell count having more variability. As the ISO standard is meant to guide fit-for-purpose method selection, interpretation of the results and quality metrics can drive method choice and optimization. The framework introduced here will help researchers select fit-for-purpose counting methods for quantification of microbial total and viable cells across a range of applications.
对于包括活生物治疗产品、食品安全和益生菌在内的应用而言,微生物细胞总数和活菌数愈发重要。在微生物学中,细胞通过诸如菌落形成单位(CFU)、流式细胞术和聚合酶链反应(PCR)等方法进行定量,但不同方法测量细胞的不同方面(被测量物),且不同方法的结果可能无法直接比较。在缺乏用于细胞计数的真实参考物质的情况下,无法量化任何细胞计数方法的准确性,这限制了方法性能评估和比较。在此,基于ISO 20391-2:2019标准开发并展示了一种针对在对数浓度范围内稀释的微生物细胞样品的细胞计数方法的改进分析。使用CFU、库尔特原理、荧光流式细胞术和阻抗流式细胞术对浓度范围从约5×10⁶个细胞/mL至2×10⁹个细胞/mL的样品进行了定量。针对每种方法计算了从ISO标准修改而来的质量指标,并表明在重复实验中具有可重复性。质量指标说明了不同方法在比例性和变异性方面的巨大差异,总细胞计数结果吻合良好,而活菌计数的变异性更大。由于ISO标准旨在指导适用方法的选择,结果和质量指标的解读可推动方法选择和优化。此处介绍的框架将帮助研究人员为一系列应用中微生物总细胞和活细胞的定量选择适用的计数方法。