• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨科医生与行业。伦理与行业激励措施。

The orthopaedic surgeon and industry. Ethics and industry incentives.

作者信息

Wenger N S, Lieberman J R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine 90095-1736, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Sep(378):39-43. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200009000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00003086-200009000-00007
PMID:10986972
Abstract

Physicians may receive various gifts and incentives from companies that make pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Although such incentives may benefit patients and physicians, they often pose serious conflicts of interest that violate a physician's professional responsibility. The physician-patient relationship is predicated on the physician acting in the best interest of the patient. The application of medical knowledge to complex clinical circumstances is difficult, even without biased sources of information and internal conflicts attributable to financial incentives. Yet, industry resources often are dedicated to the dissemination of information and incentives aimed to influence decisions not necessarily aimed at the goals of the patient. Physicians often are unaware of the nature of the incentives and commonly deny their demonstrated impact. Any incentive that is designed to impede, rather than enhance, the clinician's ability to make optimal patient care decisions is unethical for a physician to accept. These incentives should play no role in the practice of orthopaedic surgery.

摘要

医生可能会从制药和医疗设备公司获得各种礼物和奖励。尽管此类奖励可能使患者和医生受益,但它们常常引发严重的利益冲突,违反医生的职业责任。医患关系的基础是医生为患者的最大利益行事。即使没有有偏见的信息来源以及由经济激励导致的内在冲突,将医学知识应用于复杂的临床情况也是困难的。然而,行业资源往往致力于传播信息和提供奖励,旨在影响决策,而这些决策不一定以患者的目标为导向。医生常常意识不到这些奖励的本质,并且普遍否认它们已被证明的影响。任何旨在阻碍而非增强临床医生做出最佳患者护理决策能力的奖励,医生接受都是不道德的。这些奖励在骨科手术实践中不应发挥任何作用。

相似文献

1
The orthopaedic surgeon and industry. Ethics and industry incentives.骨科医生与行业。伦理与行业激励措施。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Sep(378):39-43. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200009000-00007.
2
Physician-industry relations. Part 1: individual physicians.医生与行业的关系。第一部分:个体医生。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 5;136(5):396-402. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00014.
3
Professionalism and physician interactions with industry.专业精神以及医生与行业的互动。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 May;3(5):325-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.01.022.
4
Economic incentives for ethical and courteous behavior in medicine. A proposal.医学中道德与礼貌行为的经济激励措施。一项提议。
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 15;113(10):790-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-10-790.
5
The effect of physician disclosure of financial incentives on trust.医生披露经济激励措施对信任的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Mar 28;165(6):625-30. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.6.625.
6
Talking about money: how primary care physicians respond to a patient's question about financial incentives.谈钱:基层医疗医生如何回应患者关于经济激励措施的问题。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jan;17(1):75-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10503.x.
7
The ethics of managed care: a dose of realism.管理式医疗的伦理:一剂现实主义
Cumberland Law Rev. 1997;28(2):287-314.
8
Doctors, drug companies, and gifts.医生、制药公司与礼品。
JAMA. 1989;262(24):3448-51.
9
The orthopaedic surgeon and manufacturing industry relationship. Ethical guidelines.骨科医生与制造业的关系。道德准则。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Nov(368):279-86.
10
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconsidering Planning and Management of Medical Devices Procurement in Public Health Services in Cyprus.重新审视塞浦路斯公共卫生服务中医疗设备采购的规划与管理
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Apr 19;7(6):205-14. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p205.
2
Spine surgeons: spine industry.脊柱外科医生:脊柱产业。
Eur Spine J. 2008 Jun;17(6):785-90; discussion 791-3. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0542-4. Epub 2007 Nov 20.