Suppr超能文献

对假释的麻醉品成瘾者进行纳洛酮(N-烯丙基去甲羟吗啡酮)应急治疗。

Contingent naloxone (N-allylnoroxymorphone) treatment of the paroled narcotic addict.

作者信息

Kurland A A, McCabe L, Hanlon T E

出版信息

Int Pharmacopsychiatry. 1975;10(3):157-68. doi: 10.1159/000468186.

Abstract

This is a presentation of the results of pilot and controlled research on the effectiveness of the contingent (upon narcotic drug use) administration of 500-2,000 mg daily, of the narcotic antagonist, naloxone (N-allylnoroxymorphone), to paroled narcotic addicts enrolled in a urine monitoring program conducted in a metropolitan-based outpatient clinic. Criteria of effectiveness, which include clinic attendance, the extent of narcotic drug usage, and final disposition at the end of a 6-month treatment period, are viewed in relation to already established baseline results with a sample of patients processed through the same clinic over a 5-year period prior to the introduction of naloxone treatment. Although results of the pilot study are encouraging, indicating longer patient involvement and less reinstitutionalization than baseline values, the results of the controlled evaluation reveal no benefit from contingently administered naloxone beyond placebo reactivity, which appears to be substantial in the contingent approach. The results are discussed in terms of given sample characteristics, and suggestions are offered regarding the development of new narcotic antagonist treatment approaches.

摘要

本文介绍了一项试点研究和对照研究的结果,该研究针对参加了一项在大城市门诊诊所开展的尿液监测项目的假释吸毒成瘾者,每日给予500-2000毫克麻醉拮抗剂纳洛酮(N-烯丙基去甲羟吗啡酮)(取决于是否使用麻醉药品)。有效性标准包括门诊就诊情况、麻醉药品使用程度以及6个月治疗期结束时的最终处置情况,并与在引入纳洛酮治疗前的5年时间里,通过同一诊所处理的患者样本的既定基线结果进行关联分析。尽管试点研究的结果令人鼓舞,表明患者参与时间更长,重新住院治疗的情况比基线值更少,但对照评估的结果显示,除了安慰剂反应外,应急给予纳洛酮并没有带来益处,而在应急方法中,安慰剂反应似乎相当显著。根据给定的样本特征对结果进行了讨论,并就新的麻醉拮抗剂治疗方法的开发提出了建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验