Suppr超能文献

保费回扣与医疗保险市场改革的悄然共识。

Premium rebates and the quiet consensus on market reform for Medicare.

作者信息

Feldman R, Dowd B E, Coulam R, Nichols L, Mutti A

机构信息

University of Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Winter;23(2):19-33.

Abstract

Premium rebates allow beneficiaries who choose more efficient Medicare options to receive cash rebates, rather than extra benefits. That simple idea has been controversial. Without fanfare, however, premium rebates have become a key area of agreement in the debate on Medicare reform. Moreover, in legislation in late 2000, it became official policy: Medicare+Choice (M+C) plans will be allowed to offer rebates beginning in 2003. This article explores the economic rationale for premium rebates, provides a historical perspective on the rebate debate, discusses some of the implementation issues that need to be addressed before 2003, and reviews the implications of premium rebates for current legislative proposals for Medicare reform.

摘要

保费回扣允许选择更高效医疗保险选项的受益人获得现金回扣,而非额外福利。这一简单理念一直颇具争议。然而,保费回扣在毫无声张的情况下,已成为医疗保险改革辩论中达成共识的关键领域。此外,在2000年末的立法中,它成为了官方政策:自2003年起,将允许“医疗保险+选择”(M+C)计划提供回扣。本文探讨了保费回扣的经济原理,提供了回扣辩论的历史视角,讨论了2003年之前需要解决的一些实施问题,并审视了保费回扣对当前医疗保险改革立法提案的影响。

相似文献

1
Premium rebates and the quiet consensus on market reform for Medicare.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Winter;23(2):19-33.
4
The Future of Medicare and the Role of Traditional Medicare as Competitor.
N Engl J Med. 2024 Aug 22;391(8):763-769. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2313939.
5
Is premium support the right medicine for Medicare?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Sep-Oct;19(5):84-99. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.5.84.
6
Potential effects of the "premium-support" proposal on the security of Medicare.
JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1760-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1760.
7
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.
8
Pay raise. Increased HMO funding excites many.
Mod Healthc. 2004 Feb 9;34(6):17.
10
Traditional medicare versus Medicare+Choice: a view from Congress.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W122-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w2.122.

引用本文的文献

1
Payment policy and inefficient benefits in the Medicare+Choice program.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003 Jun;3(2):79-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1023373630383.
2
Payment policy and competition in the Medicare+Choice program.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Fall;24(1):83-94.

本文引用的文献

1
Medigap premiums and Medicare HMO enrollment.
Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec;37(6):1445-68. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.10832.
2
Reforming Medicare: impacts on federal spending and choice of health plans.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;Suppl Web Exclusives:W51-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w1.51.
3
Medicare and prescription drugs.
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 29;344(13):1010-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103293441311.
5
A tale of four cities: Medicare reform and competitive pricing.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Sep-Oct;19(5):9-29. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.5.9.
6
Disparities in access to Medicare managed care plans and their benefits.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Nov-Dec;17(6):170-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.6.170.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验